Separate names with a comma.
Oh wow. The Service Center verbally told you that the reduced range is to “reduce the possibility of car fires”. Wow. That’s exactly as...
Can you provide URLs for the correct equipment? Cable and monitor... Thanks!
I did NOT get a drop on my 60kwh model S after the 2019.16.1 update. I get 168mi RR at 90% charge I currently have 115k miles on the ODO
Not if the new slower supercharger charging reduces the dentrite growth
Here’s what’s happening IMO 1). Tesla is limiting the supercharging rate in all cars before 2017. Why? Dentrites can form at high charge...
That was just my wild ass guess. 5000. Based on Tesla saying range was clipped on a very small percentage of owners. Actual number of cars...
Yes. The slower supercharger charging rate isn’t the big issue. It’s for safety so I get it. Oh well. BUT a small percentage of cars had...
Thanks. Well actually I believe ALL cars 2016 and older are impacted. I think Tesla has slowed the supercharger charging rates on all these...
Yes. Tesla’s first priority is they don’t want cars to catch fire. Hence the throttling The big question is how many cars are affected? My...
Oh brother. Of COURSE one cell had an internal short and it propagated from there. Look, if I inflate a bunch of balloons to just below their...
Interesting theory about a single “bad” module. I don’t agree though. Not in the slightest. Remember that Tesla is trying to avoid a safety...
5,000 and $20k is arbitrary assumption. Could be 50,000 cars or more As far as battery cost, the cells in your pack are FUBAR. There’s no...
Let’s say there’s 5,000 affected cars. At $20k replacement cost for each pack, that’s $100m of exposure to Tesla. Hence, we’ve got Tesla capping...
Has it been determined how Tesla determined which cars are affected? and they then limit battery capacity on those cars “for safety”...
If there’s 100 people currently reporting, than the actually number affected is probably thousands