Recent content by Norbert

January... EDIT: More specifically, January according to NASA Gistemp...

Well I just meant to say that the difference between the graphs is not as large as it may first seem. I wouldn't know which one is "better" in any sense. Considering that there are slight differences in how the data is averaged and all that (and the differences seem to fluctuate), it is likely...

It does start 1880, but below 0.0. Whereas the Berkeley Earth graph is a tiny bit above 0 in 1880. Splitting hairs this is.

1.54C "above the 1850-1900 average". The NASA figure is "w.r.t. 1951 - 1980". I don't know what the normalized difference would be. (Personally I'm looking more at the dynamic than the numbers themselves.)

Just a few more pixels...

What's wrong with this picture? (Hint: everything)

Not getting any better...

uhmmm...

Is this the de-classification that was supposed to reveal any evidence behind the DoE's "low-confidence" and the FBI's moderate-confidence assessments of the lab-leak theory? Sounds like there wasn't much behind all that excitement...

I haven't read the whole article but maybe in democratic counties the effect of mask mandates was smaller also because more of them were wearing masks anyway.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/06/climate/arctic-sea-ice-melting.html

Yes.

We probably all agree that NACS is a good thing and that this partnership is great news for electric cars in general. With Farley being thankful for the Tesla cooperation, I'm wouldn't interpret this as anything else than that.

The CNN author did know that, but the article seems to mention that as a possible part of the explanation for why the posts had such an impact in general.

Right, Elon has only the nicest of things to say about other billionaires... /s