Recent content by vikram_gupta11

Have you seen the latest image uploaded with previous replies (post no.28) ? If the second counter weight will be unloaded then it will arrived on second left side seesaw and from this side to right side seesaw so why there is need of infinite counter weights ? How are you thinking?

Dear Sir, you are thinking in wrong direction and not understanding what I want to tell you that there is no need of supply of infinite counter weights. As per sketch the right side seesaw is balanced having counter weight on right arm and a 1000 kilogram object on left arm.Now motor is pushing...

I have solved your mentioned problem of imbalanced seesaw after unloading the mass in latest image with the help of hook.I just want to know your views on it . I have also described it in post No. 28. So my earnest request to you that consider about it seriously and tell me your views. I shall...

Dear Sir, What's your view about this modified single track free energy system.

Explanation is here; This machine is based on gravity power and seesaw system.I already have written about it in my previous post but this is a simple version based on that concept. We can make it more simple . As per sketch there will be two seesaw system and both will be attached with a...

Dear sir, Hyperloop will be more costly than my presented concept.Please my request to you that see the attached image with this reply as it is completely free energy device and more over hyperloop will not work to generate the energy but we can generate more energy with the help of this...

yes ,you are right so I applied 3 newton force to turn the box+ ball system .but in the balanced position in this seesaw each Ball+box system will get 3 newton force .The overall input will be only 3 newton. If mass is balanced then F=a or in other words the applied force 3 newton will be...

But why i will use a ramp to move the seesaw .If a seesaw is in balanced position then there will be need of very very less energy.

Dear Sir, The basic premise is only to understand the concept as you also know that there is no comparison between a car and a BALANCED seesaw.

Dear sir, At first see the latest upload image in this reply.You are not understanding what I want to say .In this sketch There will be only a single track system and counter weight will be not a problem due to hook as hook will work to solve this problem.

In this sketch 10 numbered tubes will be mounted permanently on a seesaw in Horizontal direction .There will be 10 numbered 100 gram mass Iron balls and these Iron balls will move in these tubes. we will attach two piston generators (linear generator) on the both end of each tube as per...

Here is a solution of this problem and FRICTION problem. I just have to attached a 'U' shape long hook with counter weight arm of seesaw and this hook will work to hold the counter weight arm and seesaw in horizontal position after unloading the mass. To avoid friction problem the length of arm...

Dear sir, I have done some work on it and after that I post it in this forum .You cannot prove it wrong on the basis of these types of quotes.

If its works through repeated attempts then what's the wrong?

It seems that you have not understood it clearly.The counter wight will be attached permanently with the arm of seesaw and motor will work to just press the arm (COUNTER WEIGHT SIDE ARM) of this balanced seesaw with the help of a shaft.The seesaw will have a vehicle on the arm and on the second...