Search results

I prefer the ignore list if that is a menace

One does not simply make such a mistake again and again, are we living in a banana world? Is actually anyone reading Elons communication before it gets out? They've learnt nothing from all the FUD so far. Communicate properly @ Tesla. What if Apple would make such a 'tipo' as you call it -...

That is true, problem is from the statement it says that they've also built twice as many which implies a weekly m3 production of 6500

We are about to have the most amazing quarter in our history, building and delivering more than twice as many cars as we did last quarter.' I do not think we need to argue about the sense of this sentence, do we? He clearly wrote ..., building and delivering twice as many than, What does this...

'We are about to have the most amazing quarter in our history, building and delivering more than twice as many cars as we did last quarter.' I do not think we need to argue about the sense of this sentence, do we? He clearly wrote ..., building and delivering twice as many than, What does...

2x as many cars built is clearly not possible? That would imply over 107000 cars built in 1 quarter, if S+X is at optimistic 28'000, that implies 80'000 model 3 or 6500 weekly. What a lie again, Elon please. Deliveries yes, you are right, but do not mix produced and deliveries together

2x many cars built is not possible? That would imply over 107000 cars built in 1 quarter, if S+X is at optimistic 28'000, that implies 80'000 model 3 or 6500 weekly. What a lie again, Elon please. Deliveries yes, you are right, but do not mix produced and deliveries together.