I haven't had a chance to read this whole thread yet, but I'm thinking the title should have the word changed from failure to replacement.
And, each successive replacement on a given car should add another 100% for that car.
Every ICE car I've owned eventually need a new transmission, a new catalytic convertor, a new radiator, etc..
Not sure what kinds of cars you've owned, but I've never once had to replace (or even repair) a transmission or cat converter and I've owned cars for 8+ years. My mother drives an '86 Chrysler Lebaron and it's had zero transmission issues. I did have to replace the rad about 15 years ago.
Ditto on mknox's comments. For ever car I've ever personally owned, I also have never had to replace the transmission, cat nor radiator. However, admittedly none of mine hit 100K miles before I got rid of them.
The oldest car I had was a 91 Camry bought new in 91 that was a hand me down that I sold in early 02. The next oldest are my 06 Prius, bought in January 06, so a few months shy of 10 years now. The next oldest after that was an 04 Nissan 350Z, bought ~Labor Day of 03, sold in mid-2011.
Amongst the cars my parents owned, never have replaced any of those either. However, my dad's 02 Toyota Rav4 bought in early 02 did need a new either last year or this year, causing him to dump it instead of replacing it.
I don't recall the eventual ages of all the cars my parents had, but my mom's 96 Camry V6 bought new in 96, totaled in early 08 definitely never needed any of those and AFAIK only ever needed 1 or 2 repairs in its entire life.