Yep. For the price of 1GW of nuclear you can have ~15GW of gas turbines. The odds that of those 15GW of turbines at least 1GW will be available is 99.9999%. The odds of that 1GW of nuclear being available is apparently ~75% since Texas lost 1/4th of it's nuclear capacity.
Build gas turbines, build wind, build solar. Use renewables to reduce fuel burn. Use gas turbines when needed to keep the lights on. Use nuclear.... I... I honestly have no idea what nuclear is good for..... jobs? I guess jobs?
Those numbers may have been true decades ago but the Levelized Cost Of Electricity (LCOE) per MWh in the United States for nuclear is lower than coal and only slightly higher than NG (Levelized Costs of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2021 (eia.gov)). Advanced nuclear reactors are cost competitive and even beat NG (https://www.innovationreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Advanced-Nuclear-Reactors-Cost-Study.pdf).
It's more comparable to say 1GW of nuclear is cost comparative to 1.3GW of natural gas. Using those numbers nuclear fares far better than NG in the current Texas scenario and has no greenhouse gas emissions concerns. So that's what nuclear is good for.