SherSlick
Member
Honestly I am fairly upset about the HP claim. Not that I cannot appreciate it feeing fast, but don't over promise and under deliver.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is the range issue still an issue? It was EPA rated at 253 when I bought it and I easily beat that and I'm not a light footed driver. Or was it that when it was first announced that the range would be better than the none D version...but even then wasn't he only referring to the 85D and not the P85D?
For those of us who have 2014 P85Ds, ordered in October... given everything we know today... any regrets? Would you still have ordered/traded/etc? Was it worth it?
For some bullet points, What we know now that we didn't in October:
- P85D doesn't actually have 691 HP (almost 500 HP in reality)
- $5000/$10000 option might make this actually possible "soon" (Ludicrous mode/P90D)
- We still don't have autopilot (several months my ***)
- P85D is still *not* more efficient than it's single motor counterparts. (Originally claimed +20 miles vs P85, after multiple updates at best almost as efficient and dash shows -12 miles vs P85)
- Many months delays on next-gen seat installs
- etc
Personally, knowing even a couple of the above and I'd still be driving my P21636 P85.
Just curious how others who took delivery of a P85D in December feel now. I know there are a lot of us here.
I think many who came from ICE cars had nothing to compare to, and as such may be more forgiving from those who upgraded from the P85+ or earlier models.
*snip*
- Next-gen seat retrofit delay: it was unfortunate that we didn't get our next-gen seats at delivery, but we had the choice of postponing delivery altogether or get the car earlier with standard seats. I find that very generous of Tesla, given the delay was due to an upstream issue. Besides, we now have less wear and tear on our next-gen seats than we would if we had received them from day 1. Tesla didn't charge us for the wear and tear on the standard seats they took out, nor for the retrofit work, so I'm a happy camper.
- Etc: everything else has been a joy for me. I had a drive unit failure, but it was taken care of super gracefully, quickly, and I had a loaner P85D in the meantime that I put miles on at no cost.
Life's good, the car's awesome, I really can't complain!! I hope others can see it that way too :biggrin:
- 691 HP: why does this matter? The P85D was advertised as doing 0-60 mph in 3.2 seconds, and it not only delivered that but can now do it in 3.1! You can even get 2.8 if you pay for the upgrade, which is totally reasonable in my opinion (not that I would necessarily do it, to each his own).
- Autopilot: the other thread Jason created says it all and I've made my points clear there. In short: it's software, it's complicated, it deals with life-and-death situations, so I'm being patient!
- Efficiency/range: the P85D was never advertised to be more efficient than non-dual motor models. The 85D was, and is. The first numbers that came out for the P85D were 285 miles AT 65 MPH, which is vastly different than EPA numbers. P85D delivers 285 miles at 65 mph, just like the non-D 85kWh versions. EPA is lower (253 vs. 265) due to lower efficiency at low speed - BUT YOU GET INSANE MODE! And efficiency really is only more important at higher speeds anyway, for road trips and such. When I saw 285 miles at 65 mph for the P85D and 295 miles at 65 mph for the 85D, I knew it wouldn't matter much - INSANE acceleration was more important to me. If you really wanted more range, you should've ordered the 85D and waited another couple of months.
- Next-gen seat retrofit delay: it was unfortunate that we didn't get our next-gen seats at delivery, but we had the choice of postponing delivery altogether or get the car earlier with standard seats. I find that very generous of Tesla, given the delay was due to an upstream issue. Besides, we now have less wear and tear on our next-gen seats than we would if we had received them from day 1. Tesla didn't charge us for the wear and tear on the standard seats they took out, nor for the retrofit work, so I'm a happy camper.
It matters because a car with 691 HP should perform much better at speed. Just yesterday I was at a 30 MPH roll along side my wife, me her both punched it, and she *beat* me. Not just a moved a little away, she literally took the P85D by a car length before the P85D was able to just maintain speed with her P85 and slowly creep up once we hit ~80-ish. I was even at a higher SoC (~85%) than her since she had just driven over 120 miles (~50%). Not going to lie, that pissed me off. The P85D should in no way be able to be bested by a P85.
Sure, then they shouldn't have demonstrated it as if they had it done and nearly ready to go 10 months ago, used present tense terminology in all marketing material, etc.
I think the below image, which I captured from Tesla's website on 12/04/2014, is what you're referring to. At the time, 85 and 85D were not available side-by-side (choosing dual-motor would override 85 with 85D), but you would see 265 miles EPA and 285 miles at 65 mph (what they used to call "ideal") for the 85. I also summarized it in a post back on the same date these numbers were released, 12/04/2014:Not sure where people get this from. As written up thread, Elon himself, while standing in front of a P85D chassis, said "everything about the car improves with dual motor" and that they've been able to "increase efficiency" by adding the second motor. Then the website shows the P85D next to other models showing 285 miles. Then conversations with Tesla staff locally and at HQ confirmed that it would have more range. Come on now.
MarcG said:Model S 65 range: 215 (ideal), 208 (EPA)
Model S 85 range: 285 (ideal), 265 (EPA)
Model S 85D range: 295 (ideal), no EPA yet
Model S P85D range: 285 (ideal), no EPA yet
No man should ever be beat by his wife in a car race. LOL. This is strange though, did you have RANGE MODE set to ON in the P85D? If so, the rear motor could've been torque-sleeping at the time you punched it...
I think the below image, which I captured from Tesla's website on 12/04/2014, is what you're referring to. At the time, 85 and 85D were not available side-by-side (choosing dual-motor would override 85 with 85D), but you would see 265 miles EPA and 285 miles at 65 mph (what they used to call "ideal") for the 85. I also summarized it in a post back on the same date these numbers were released, 12/04/2014:
Anyway, the point is, if you compared apples-to-apples, you would clearly see that highway range is comparable between 85 and P85D, while 85D is slightly more efficient.
View attachment 90094
Hmm I'm sorry Jason, I think it's clear that you were basing your P85D purchase decision on its performance and range relative to the P85 you already had, and the outcome was obviously disappointing for you.
As Aargau rightly mentioned above, and I quoted him stating I thought it was a really good point, the expectation of previous Model S owners who upgraded to the P85D was clearly higher than that prospective P85D buyers that were brand new to the Tesla family. In other words, I really can't relate to (though I can totally understand) your frustrations.
Best of luck with your next move, whatever it may end up being. I would be sad to see you go though...
Maybe it's your moderate weather or terrain or something, but for me 350 Wh/mi is what I get with normal driving here in the summer. When I'm more aggressive, it easily gets in the 400s, and in the winter, fuhgeddaboudit! I'm up in the 500s regularly.
- 691 HP: why does this matter? The P85D was advertised as doing 0-60 mph in 3.2 seconds, and it not only delivered that but can now do it in 3.1! You can even get 2.8 if you pay for the upgrade, which is totally reasonable in my opinion (not that I would necessarily do it, to each his own).
As Aargau rightly mentioned above, and I quoted him stating I thought it was a really good point, the expectation of previous Model S owners who upgraded to the P85D was clearly higher than that prospective P85D buyers that were brand new to the Tesla family. In other words, I really can't relate to (though I can totally understand) your frustrations.
I can understand some of these frustrations not bothering a new owner as much, for sure, and I'm glad you're happy with the car.
Are freeway passing speeds really the gripe? I feel like my 85D has more than enough umph, the P85 loaner I drove even more. I feel like anything more puts you in triple-digit-lose-your-license territory but I guess to each his own.That's way way too high for summer driving. Have you checked your alignment? Do you have the 19" or 21" wheels. It makes a big difference and the EPA test was only done for the 19" standard wheels.
- - - Updated - - -
I know this has been said like a million times but you didn't get the memo. It matters to those that care about freeway passing speeds. The P85D doesn't pass as fast a a car that actually has 1 hp for every 7 lbs rather than 1 hp for every 9 lbs like the P85D actually has.
But I agree about the 0-60 and don't understand why folks are complaining about that at all.
Are freeway passing speeds really the gripe? I feel like my 85D has more than enough umph, the P85 loaner I drove even more. I feel like anything more puts you in triple-digit-lose-your-license territory but I guess to each his own.
For those of us who have 2014 P85Ds, ordered in October... given everything we know today... any regrets? Would you still have ordered/traded/etc? Was it worth it?
For some bullet points, What we know now that we didn't in October:
- P85D doesn't actually have 691 HP (almost 500 HP in reality)
- $5000/$10000 option might make this actually possible "soon" (Ludicrous mode/P90D)
- We still don't have autopilot (several months my ***)
- P85D is still *not* more efficient than it's single motor counterparts. (Originally claimed +20 miles vs P85, after multiple updates at best almost as efficient and dash shows -12 miles vs P85)
- Many months delays on next-gen seat installs
- etc
Personally, knowing even a couple of the above and I'd still be driving my P21636 P85.
Just curious how others who took delivery of a P85D in December feel now. I know there are a lot of us here.
Yes, that's the gripe.
My Prius has enough passing speed for what it is but if I thought the 85D was enough passing power for me I would have bought that and not the P85D.
The next-gen seats took about a 6 month wait, which didn't bother me, but the front seats have been making squeaking noises because it rubs against the center console and Tesla service couldn't really do anything to fix it.