You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do people think of the speed of the new urban chargers?
They are pretty solid. I rarely get over 50kw sustained anyway and with TM3 and any S/X pack 75KWh or smaller wont see much of a difference when you factor in the entire time charging. Most super chargers split 145 so having 72 dedicated at chargers that are mostly full would be nearly identical.
Looking forward to "5-10 minute" charging once supply catches up with demand.
Yeah. We may just get a continuation of the current government. Which is pretty good for Tesla, EVs and renewable energy, but the situation could also have improved.
General Elections
9:16pm: Solberg predicted to defeat Støre by 1 seat: prognosis
Current prognosis gives Erna Solberg's "blue bloc" 85 seats to 84 in support of a Jonas Gahr Støre-led government.
LIVE: BREAKING: Solberg to continue as PM: prognosis
I think the charging speed is pretty ideal for shopping/eating. Hopefully they're considerably less expensive to install (all costs) than the larger design.What do people think of the speed of the new urban chargers?
One thing to keep in mind is that the BBC article, that Electrek sources, says it's $50 bn of battery orders, not investment into battery production:Unless the VW CEO announced the $50 billion investment in battery production without already having gone through all the hoops he needs to in bringing VW's BOD and his top managers on board, it looks like this is real, and would be difficult to backtrack from.
The German firm, whose brands include Seat and Skoda, also said it would place orders worth more than 50bn euros for batteries to power the cars.
One thing to keep in mind is that the BBC article, that Electrek sources, says it's $50 bn of battery orders, not investment into battery production
a few points from the article,
"The investigative staff of U.S. National Transportation Safety Board... recommended that Tesla’s Autopilot system be declared a contributing factor in the crash because it allowed the driver to go for long periods without steering or apparently even looking at the road, according to a person briefed on the findings"
"The statement also praised Tesla for improving its Autopilot software after the accident, changes it said were a direct result of the crash."
what's more, we now know the Model 3 has an internal camera pointing back in the cabin... i.e., this could well allow monitoring of the driver's attention.
"The truck driver’s failure to yield and Brown’s inattention to the highway were the primary reasons for the collision, the NTSB staff concluded in its draft report, according to the person briefed on it."
Just got of the phone with my father, who had his factory tour today.
Model 3 production is now on the production line not on the pilot line anymore.
Other then that not much to share, although he did manage to snap a picture of a VIN 313, which seems to be good considering that they still have 3 weeks to go to hit 1500.
VIN 313 has a date of manufacture of 07/2017. This adds more evidence to there are big noises in the relationship between VIN and monthly production.Just got of the phone with my father, who had his factory tour today.
Model 3 production is now on the production line not on the pilot line anymore.
Other then that not much to share, although he did manage to snap a picture of a VIN 313, which seems to be good considering that they still have 3 weeks to go to hit 1500.
Are RC cars allowed to have that sticker saying the options, price, and fuel economy?VIN 313 is probably an RC car. Like this 316 noted in July
Tesla updates VIN decoder for Model 3 production vehicles
a couple of points from the article,
"The investigative staff of U.S. National Transportation Safety Board... recommended that Tesla’s Autopilot system be declared a contributing factor in the crash because it allowed the driver to go for long periods without steering or apparently even looking at the road, according to a person briefed on the findings"
to my view "contributing factor" sounds fair (though Bloomberg title "should share blame" I think is somewhat misleading) what's more, we now know the Model 3 has an internal camera pointing back in the cabin... i.e., this could well allow monitoring of the driver's attention.
"The truck driver’s failure to yield and Brown’s inattention to the highway were the primary reasons for the collision, the NTSB staff concluded in its draft report, according to the person briefed on it."