mtndrew1
Active Member
As above, agree to disagree.
Lack of good user interface is a piss-poor excuse regardless of car maker. In your scenario above, it's trivially easy to always default to the "safe" form of cruise and the attentive driver given the option to use old-school behavior on-demand.
I'm "forced" on every new drive to have the emergency braking thing enabled, I can turn it off at will however. Not rocket science (and we know Elon can do rocket science).
Not interested in a sadly pointless debate because only Tesla can make the fixes to TACC and/or allow the behavior a non-zero number of customers are interested in having available.
The only real argument that holds any water for me is they don't want to spend the resources.
Enjoy your day
Every carmaker also disables TACC and does not allow dumb cruise when the radar sensor is snow-packed for the same reason.
If you were on TACC, the radar is obstructed, and the system changed to dumb cruise it’s not difficult to imagine the resulting pileup as someone expects the car to slow because 99% of the time it’s set to do exactly that, regardless of UI. People don’t realize their high beams are on with a simple UI that’s been consistent for 60 years.
The absurd headlines we get now for people driving themselves into fire trucks would have an exponent added.
Sometimes things need to be set to accommodate the lowest common denominator because other people’s lives are at stake if things go sideways. It might not be ideal for those who never make mistakes but that’s how it is. Expect it to remain that way no matter which car you get with TACC.
I agree that TACC could be better but my recent 2,000 mile drive in a Toyota minivan with TACC showed me that phantom braking isn’t Tesla specific but of course Toyota’s system will remain static in its abilities for the life of the car.