The issue isn't degradation. The battery never had acceptable range from delivery a few weeks ago.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you won't because Tesla has capped the battery charging to 98%.....you will never see 100% and 391......391 is only for the long range plus I believe....I had only been able to charge to 320 miles with my 2020 MS LR (Jan) until I got the surprised secret update to 391....You’d think so, but almost zero Model S leaving the factory these days meet that criteria. I’d love to see a pic of a model S instrument cluster ACTUALLY showing 391 miles.
I have no idea what you’re talking about.you won't because Tesla has capped the battery charging to 98%.....you will never see 100% and 391......391 is only for the long range plus I believe....I had only been able to charge to 320 miles with my 2020 MS LR (Jan) until I got the surprised secret update to 391....
Now at 90% charge ( which is really 88%) I get 383....do the math.....391/100 = x/98...equals 383 miles....and 383/98 = x/90....equals 351 miles......
So. I'll bet that a non-long range plus will get far less than that....the LR plus are rated at 391 but dont expect it......we have been capped at 98%....at least that is what my car is indicating when I charge
If that's the case, Tesla customers are stupider than I thought. Nobody should be accepting delivery of any Tesla car if it doesn't show the advertised EPA range at 100% charge. Tesla is patently lying about its range and the displayed range at 100% is proof. That display is based on a simple calculation: Energy remaining (Wh) ÷ EPA constant (Wh). The EPA constant is determined through Tesla's EPA testing and should not change, although one lawsuit alleges that Tesla changes this over time to hide battery degradation.You’d think so, but almost zero Model S leaving the factory these days meet that criteria. I’d love to see a pic of a model S instrument cluster ACTUALLY showing 391 miles.
I contacted Tesla service with the issue of only having 361 mi of range. They claim that is based on previous driving history. This is a bizarre concept because past driving is not necessarily representative of a planned trip where you range charge. My thought is the range should be based on a standard consumption of 256 Watts/mi. that way we can determine the extent of battery degradation. I have no idea how many mi of previous driving history is utilized in the computation of mi after a 100% charge.
I took delivery in Denver and drove to Las Vegas. There were sections of Interstate Highway that had an 80 mph speed limit. Consumption during that trip has no relationship to a planned route with a 65 mph speed limit.
I contacted Tesla service with the issue of only having 361 mi of range. They claim that is based on previous driving history.
... only for the long range plus I believe....I had only been able to charge to 320 miles with my 2020 MS LR (Jan) until I got the surprised secret update to 391....
Now at 90% charge ( which is really 88%) I get 383...
I did a 100 % charge last Friday morning. The charging display indicated I had 361 mi of range (expected mi) upon completion of the charge. I have never seen 391 mi of expected range. I rarely do a 100% charge. I only did so to see what the indication would be for a 100% charge.
sorry if I made it confusing. the equation is a proportion......cross multiple and solve for x......the 100 and 98 and 90 are the % of chargeI have no idea what you’re talking about.
I get 385 at 90% charge.....this is over the last 5 charges with 2020.16.2.1.....Tesla shows "battery range to be 386.87Your car actually shows 391 rated miles on the display near a 100% state of charge? It seems like yours should show closer to 425 miles of range near 100% (383 miles * 100) / 90 where the 100 and 90 are 100% and 90% respectively.