TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

2021 model Y scan my Tesla battery size

Discussion in 'Model Y: Battery & Charging' started by coconutboy84, Dec 6, 2020.

  1. imola.zhp

    imola.zhp Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2020
    Messages:
    382
    Location:
    Memphis
    Only Performance Y's are known to have the 82kW pack right now. So if you picked up a stock LR-AWD you likely have the 78kW pack, should have the other items discussed here but none of the upcoming items shown on the China built Y recently.
     
  2. Ctuna

    Ctuna Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2018
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Santa Cruz , Ca
    #102 Ctuna, Jan 9, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2021
    Wouldn't they publish a range increase along with the new battery?
    Was that 82kw battery increase part of the last increase in the model 3?s

    Also the stated battery's where 75 and 82 kw .
    I guess that is usable capacity ?
    And it seems from reading this stuff that it's kind of
    a fuzzy number.
     
  3. pt19713

    pt19713 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2020
    Messages:
    688
    Location:
    Delaware
    It's 78 & 82 kWh with about 75 and 80 usable, and there is a 3.4 kWh buffer within that 75/80.
     
    • Like x 2
  4. TomaGo

    TomaGo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2019
    Messages:
    73
    Location:
    France
    Hello Alan,

    Can you tell me why is it better to select 5 miles average ?

    Thanks
     
  5. AlanSubie4Life

    AlanSubie4Life Efficiency Obsessed Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    8,904
    Location:
    San Diego
    That was in the context of a new vehicle which may not have more than 5 miles on the odometer, and wanted to make sure all the data was valid in the Energy Consumption screen. I have no idea how it behaves if there is no data. 5/15/30 miles makes no difference for the calculations, though you can use all three to get the "best guess" of the correct answer (helps eliminate some rounding error).
     
    • Like x 1
  6. AlanSubie4Life

    AlanSubie4Life Efficiency Obsessed Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    8,904
    Location:
    San Diego
    #106 AlanSubie4Life, Jan 18, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2021
    They did. (Deleted the info about the Performance Model 3...wrong forum!). As far as I can tell it is 303 rated miles now vs. 291 previously (a portion of this is probably due to efficiency improvements though). I don't follow Model Y closely.

    Nope, it's extremely well known and precisely defined. There's no fuzziness to these capacity numbers at all (there is a small amount of variation in initial capacity from vehicle to vehicle but that is random variation, not a fuzziness of the actual nominal capacity). They are published by the EPA for all to see in exquisite detail. Basic Search | Document Index System | US EPA
     
  7. TomaGo

    TomaGo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2019
    Messages:
    73
    Location:
    France
    Ok, understrand, thanks :)
     
  8. scottf200

    scottf200 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2013
    Messages:
    3,759
    Location:
    Chicagoland ModelX S603
    Example where it makes little difference.

    [​IMG]

    Sample using wolframalph or google calc:
    (118 mi) * (477 Wh/mi) / 0.79 in kWh
    (118 mi) * (477 Wh/mi) / 0.79 in kWh - Wolfram|Alpha
    ((118 mi) * 477 (Wh / mi)) / 0.79 =
    118 mi *477 Wh/mi / 0.79 in kWh - Google Search
     
    • Like x 1
  9. MY-Y

    MY-Y Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2020
    Messages:
    818
    Location:
    MD
    Two of your numbers surprise me.

    1. I never get above 72 kWh using that calculation. 92 seems quite high.
    2. ~450 Wh/mi??? Are you towing? Even in the winter, I'm normally well below 300. My lifetime (since June) is below 250.
     
  10. AlanSubie4Life

    AlanSubie4Life Efficiency Obsessed Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    8,904
    Location:
    San Diego
    This isn't from a Model Y.
     
  11. MY-Y

    MY-Y Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2020
    Messages:
    818
    Location:
    MD
    Makes sense. MX I assume? 450 Wh/mi - just wow. Even more glad I got the MY.
     
  12. scottf200

    scottf200 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2013
    Messages:
    3,759
    Location:
    Chicagoland ModelX S603
    Sorry for the confusion. My signature shows my vehicle.

    I was showing the comparison of 2 things that were the discussion points: 1) Est kWh and 2) the projected range sample of 5/15/30.

    In my X, I am normally in the mid-to-high 300s. Winter, short drives, or with my bikes on the tow rack I'm in the 400s.
     
  13. MY-Y

    MY-Y Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2020
    Messages:
    818
    Location:
    MD
    No problem. Unfortunately, signatures with pertinent info like that don't show up in my cellphone's mobile view.
     
    • Like x 1
  14. ratsbew

    ratsbew Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,116
    Location:
    O'Fallon, IL
    Fascinating thread. I'm ordering a AWD Y soon. Sure do wish that they would put the larger pack in the regular AWD. It would give somewhere around 12 extra miles of range.
     
  15. AlanSubie4Life

    AlanSubie4Life Efficiency Obsessed Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    8,904
    Location:
    San Diego
    Wait, then. Probably a matter of time.
     
  16. BigKRIT

    BigKRIT Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2020
    Messages:
    75
    Location:
    Canada
    I was trying to find this but on pages 17 and 18 the MYP has less miles for both city and highway driving, can you please tell me what you're referring to when you say MYP does better mileage on highway than LRAWD?
     
  17. Iceman23

    Iceman23 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    NJ
    I DMT new June 2020 build MYP was 77.x kw and now shows 72.1kw, does that mean it is degrading too quickly?

    it is winter and very cold in NJ so I sure that is slowing son electrons down.
     
  18. jonathanp

    jonathanp Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2021
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    Canada
    So has anyone been able to confirm if the new Model Y Performance does in fact have the 82 kwh battery?
     
  19. pt19713

    pt19713 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2020
    Messages:
    688
    Location:
    Delaware
    it's been confirmed on both the M3P and MYP, 2021 models.
     
    • Like x 2
  20. adomanim

    adomanim Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2020
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    annaba
    Regarding the home charging speed the sr gets 32A so I’d assume it’ll be the same












    Kodi nox
     
    • Like x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC