You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm pretty sure it's much more simple than you are thinking. It's just not necessary, and putting in the disconnect is two more sets of terminations of wires screwed into lugs, which is more potential problem/failure points in the connection chain where something may not be installed well or fastened in tight enough. It's more reliable to just have uninterrupted wire than going through the switch. With high current things, you just want as few junctions as possible.What do you guys think about Tesla's statement that an external disconnect switch is not recommended?
Could it really be they just not want the wifi to be off? What other reasons could there be?
I just had a new HVAC system installed at my home this month. The old gas furnace and AC compressor were over 35 years old. The AC compressor is wired to a 240V/30A circuit breaker. There was an old galvanized metal service disconnect box (badly rusted) mounted on the side of the house close by the AC compressor. The installer noted that he installed a new disconnect while connecting the new AC compressor. This is in Maryland.The NEC requirement is that if something is OVER 60A, then it always does require a lockable disconnect. For 60A and below, that is not required by NEC. But there are sometimes some state or local requirements for it for these lesser levels.
As long as you have room or can make room for a double pole breaker your 100A main is likely fine and it's completely normal to have the branch circuit breakers add up to way more than the main. If your electrician or inspector insists that a 50A breaker will be a code violation you can step down as low as 30A with the wire you already have, but if you go below 40A you'll need a 14-30 instead of 14-50.
Don't sweat it and don't get sucked in by all the electricians (and TMC posters) who insist that a bigger panel is somehow better. If you get this all done and you're tripping the main just lower your charge current a little, you can set it to whatever you want. If that proves unsatisfactory *then* you can upgrade the panel. But really, the charger only uses 32A at max power, it's not some huge load that's going to overwhelm your electrical system, it's more like installing a second oven.
Peelz, Is your installer using a GFCI breaker?
The GFCI built into the Mobile Connector (Wall Connector too) is designed to protect the user when plugging and unplugging the charging connector from the vehicle's charging port. The GFCI circuit breaker, where required, provides protection when plugging and unplugging the NEMA 14-50 plug from the receptacle. (Turning off the power at the panel before plugging or unplugging the NEMA 14-50 plug from the receptacle is even safer, makes the GFCI circuit breaker of questionable benefit.)
Yeah, it's hard to wait...
Keep us posted on what you find when you get home and how you like it.
I am leaning towards the Wall Connector myself, and started a new thread here to compare costs vs the outlet option. I am really liking the WC option.
Wall Connector vs 14-50R Outlet Plus Mobile Connector
I'm giving some thought as to what to install for my future MY and am currently leaning towards the Wall connector. One of the reasons is I understand that an outlet install requires a GFCI breaker whereas the Wall connector does not. I put together the following cost differential (Lowes...teslamotorsclub.com
Peelz, Is your installer using a GFCI breaker?
And then there was more discussion about what it does and why that's of little benefit, which is all true. But I'm here to just tie up these loose ends, that the real reason is just because code requires it. That was added to code in 2017, that ANY outlet being installed for the purpose of EV charging must use a GFCI breaker. It's a stupid requirement, but it's there.I'm told the mobile charger has one in it so I don't think so but I will find out when I get home. He did mention he didn't use the 50 I had bought to my wife but not why or what he replaced it with..
well Iowa all but disavows the mere existence of EV's (At least teslas) so there isn't squat for that code. at least in my little town lol YET.And then there was more discussion about what it does and why that's of little benefit, which is all true. But I'm here to just tie up these loose ends, that the real reason is just because code requires it. That was added to code in 2017, that ANY outlet being installed for the purpose of EV charging must use a GFCI breaker. It's a stupid requirement, but it's there.
That is irrelevant if Iowa likes or supports EVs. It's in the versions of NEC starting with the 2017 version, and guess what? Iowa has adopted an even newer version. They are on the 2020 release. So yeah--it's in there.well Iowa all but disavows the mere existence of EV's (At least teslas) so there isn't squat for that code. at least in my little town lol YET.
What about NEMA 14-50 receptacles used for powering an RV, wouldn't it make sense to require a GFCI protected 14-50 receptacle to protect the operator of an RV when plugging in and unplugging a motorhome?And then there was more discussion about what it does and why that's of little benefit, which is all true. But I'm here to just tie up these loose ends, that the real reason is just because code requires it. That was added to code in 2017, that ANY outlet being installed for the purpose of EV charging must use a GFCI breaker. It's a stupid requirement, but it's there.
Yes, that absolutely would make more sense, which is why this requirement only for electric vehicles is ridiculously stupid and does not make sense.What about NEMA 14-50 receptacles used for powering an RV, wouldn't it make sense to require a GFCI protected 14-50 receptacle to protect the operator of an RV when plugging in and unplugging a motorhome?
I recall that the owner's manual for my ClipperCreek EVSE states that you should always turn off the power to the circuit whenever plugging in or unplugging the EVSE from the receptacle. I admit that I haven't always turned off the power at the panel when plugging/unplugging; the 14-50 receptacle is located inside my garage and I'm not standing in a puddle of water.Yes, that absolutely would make more sense, which is why this requirement only for electric vehicles is ridiculously stupid and does not make sense.