TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

4600 pounds

Discussion in 'Model S' started by richkae, Jun 22, 2012.

  1. richkae

    richkae VIN587

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,917
    When did the car hit 4600 pounds?
    I thought it was 4000 pounds.
     
  2. brianman

    brianman Burrito Founder

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    15,487
  3. TEG

    TEG TMC Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    17,252
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    Years back they even said 3825lbs...
    First Look at the New 2012 Tesla Model S - Photos and Just-Released Details at RoadandTrack.com
    2012 Tesla Model S new photos released
    etc., etc., ...

    Unfortunately I think it is all too common in the auto industry for production cars to come in a lot heavier than the early estimates.
    Among other things, as safety tests become more stringent, additional strengthening needs to be added which adds weight.

    They probably had a lot of meetings to debate each pound that had to be added here and there. Also the drive-train engineers probably got asked to produce more torque to still meet performance goals in spite of added weight.
     
  4. gg_got_a_tesla

    gg_got_a_tesla Model S: VIN P65513, Model 3 Res Holder

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2010
    Messages:
    6,097
    Location:
    Redwood Shores, CA
    And, they managed to meet the range targets too despite the 20+% increase in weight! Kudos!
     
  5. Discoducky

    Discoducky Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,884
    Location:
    Seattle
  6. mcornwell

    mcornwell Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,016
    Location:
    USA
    Are those dry weights? 20 gallons of 91 octane will add 120 lbs... Electrons? Not so much...
     
  7. Discoducky

    Discoducky Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,884
    Location:
    Seattle
    Good point, I'd bet dry weight, because I'm sure they always shoot for the lowest possible number to print. Racing with a full tank sloshing around might be enough to shift the balance back to Model S.
     
  8. mcornwell

    mcornwell Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    1,016
    Location:
    USA
    C/D 300 mile trip average: 14 mpg, 12mpg, 12mpg.

    And I thought my S4 was bad at 14-19...
     
  9. SoCalGuy

    SoCalGuy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    253
    Location:
    LA/NYC
    4,700lbs?

    So now that the cars are in customers' hands, it seems as though the lid is off on the final production curb weight for the Model S: 4,642lbs. That seems quite a bit higher than the 3800-4,000lbs that Tesla had been hinting at over the last year or so. In fact, I thought one of the reps at a Beta event said it should be "pretty close" to 4,000lbs. Anyone have any insight into why that is? That makes the Karma at 5,300lbs not look quite as glutenous as it first appeared vis a vis the Model S (now the difference is 600lbs rather than the estimated 1600lbs.....)
     
  10. jomo25

    jomo25 P4398

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,938
    Location:
    Tempe, AZ
  11. xhawk101

    xhawk101 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,066
    i would still hope 60kwh and 40 kwh will be sig lighter in spite of reports they will weigh the same....
     
  12. ckessel

    ckessel Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,266
    Why? Presumably you don't really care about the weight, but the things you think you'd get without it, such as range and acceleration? I'm guessing the weight difference is fairly small overall and so you really wouldn't gain much of anything with a marginally lighter battery pack.
     
  13. jerry33

    jerry33 S85 - VIN:P05130 - 3/2/13

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    12,763
    Location:
    Texas
    In a full sized ICE car the rule-of-thumb is that 500 lbs gains one mpg.
     
  14. ckessel

    ckessel Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,266
    True, but it doesn't have regen. Keeping a car in motion going in motion isn't a big change in efficiency. Rolling efficiency is pretty good regardless of weight unless you get into semi truck size. The efficiency loss is in starting and stopping that extra mass, but with regen that's not nearly as big a factor.
     
  15. AnOutsider

    AnOutsider S532 # XS27

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    11,923
    Finally home to do so, but looks like it's been done :)
     

Share This Page