TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

4680 cell implications

Discussion in 'Cybertruck: Battery & Charging' started by swengl, Sep 24, 2020.

  1. swengl

    swengl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    522
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    It's amazing to me that, in the aftermath of Battery Day, no one has really focused on the charging implications of the new cell design. The chart presented, if accurate, would indicate that the 4680 cells should take almost no time to fully charge. If that is the case, the bottleneck will move to the charging infrastructure itself and the amount of energy it can transfer. The fact that the CyberTruck and the Semi would be the only vehicles (initially, at least) to receive the new cell design also makes me wonder if Elon has something else up his sleeve for the rest of the fleet, that will still use the 2170 and the 18650 cells. If I were a betting man, I would put some money on the integration/use of supercapacitors.
     
    • Disagree x 2
    • Like x 1
  2. Cyber_Dav

    Cyber_Dav Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2019
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    SoCal
    Few believe supercaps have any place in the power electronics. They capture and release bursts of energy, so maybe regen and ludicrous mode helpers.

    My question is, if the new cells are not ready when Cybertruck starts production, will early Cybertrucks be orphans with lower spec batteries?
     
    • Funny x 2
  3. dazedNconfuzed

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2020
    Messages:
    176
    Location:
    GA
    Clarify the “almost no time” deduction.

    (I’m still trying to wrap my head around the battery chemistry. Didn’t occur to me to consider time factors yet.)
     
  4. JG T3SLA

    JG T3SLA Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2018
    Messages:
    164
    Location:
    San Francisco
    That's a good question. I'd be inclined to delay purchase a bit to get the new batteries. Seems to be a non trivial upgrade so worth the wait. My presumption is that the ranges quoted for the CT, especially the tri motor, are dependent on these new batteries.
     
    • Like x 1
  5. swengl

    swengl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    522
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    The actual amount of time has not been revealed, but this image gives you some idea of the drastic reduction in time to charge. 2020.09-tesla-battery-day-elon-musk-drew-baglino-4680-cell-jelly-roll-supercharging-thermal.png
     
    • Like x 3
    • Disagree x 2
  6. swengl

    swengl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    522
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    I won't buy a CT unless it has the newer cells, I will gladly wait a bit longer for that improvement, if needed.
     
  7. swengl

    swengl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    522
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    . After looking at this, it may not be as drastic a reduction as I had thought/hoped. The current battery diameters are 18 and 21mm respectively and the chart starts at the 21mm. Oh well :(
     
  8. swengl

    swengl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    522
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    Here's an article that details some of the other potential uses for supercapacitors and EVs. What is a supercapacitor? The next step for EVs and hybrids explained
     
  9. MP3Mike

    MP3Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    14,925
    Location:
    Oregon
    The chart shows that it is actually slower. Just not as slow as sizing the "tabbed" design up to 46x80.
     
  10. brkaus

    brkaus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    7,626
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Every EV is an orphan with a lower spec battery pretty quick. Batteries and the configuration of batteries are always improving.
     
  11. Watts_Up

    Watts_Up Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2019
    Messages:
    3,092
    Location:
    In a galaxy far, far away
    You can still use it down the hill.... unless Nikola Motors patented it and would sue Tesla !!!
     
    • Funny x 2
  12. swengl

    swengl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2014
    Messages:
    522
    Location:
    Lynchburg, VA
    It goes a bit against reason that even though the tabless cells don't have the same heat mgmt issues that the existing cells have, they would take longer to charge. Having many points of contact (being tabless) and thus reducing the distance the energy has to travel would also make you think: this should charge faster than existing cells. The way the current packs are charged, once they are above ~75% charged the charge rate slows to help manage the heat to protect the pack from damage, something that the new cells reportedly won't have to do. Any thoughts as to why all of this would result in a slower charge for the new cells?
     
  13. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    The chart is normalized to make the 21mm speeds identical for the twp types. It's purpose is to show the relative impact on charge speed vs diameter for each specific type, not to compare the speeds of the two types. Otherwise, a 15mm tabbed would extrapolate to be faster than a 15mm tabless.
     
  14. bluhorshue

    bluhorshue Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2017
    Messages:
    44
    Location:
    Seattle Wa
    I think this chart shows that while a tabless battery charges much faster than a battery with a tab, doesn't it also show that a larger diameter battery takes LONGER to charge. This difference is greatly minimized because it is tabless, but it is still a longer amount of time. The bigger battery suggests slower supercharging, not faster. Maybe this is offset by the energy capacity, but without units I don't think you can draw the conclusion that the new batteries will charge faster, and if anything they might charge slower.
     
  15. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    10,212
    Location:
    Maine
    Well, it's slower to charge a cell, but if the cells allow for significantly increased energy density, increased power density and are much cheaper, then you'd be paying the same amount for more range and faster charging, or paying much less for about the same charging but with more range, or somewhere in between.

    Personally, I'll take a cheap long-range electric that's a bit slower to charge.
     
  16. mark95476

    mark95476 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2020
    Messages:
    725
    Location:
    Bay Area CA
    Yes. This graph is saying charge times increases on the new tabless cells are decoupled or virtually independent of the cell size.

    I think charge times on the tabless cells will be faster for the same amount of energy (100 kWh). I expect them to be able to sustain higher charge rates for longer.

     
    • Like x 2
  17. mark95476

    mark95476 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2020
    Messages:
    725
    Location:
    Bay Area CA
    It won't. I can see them using the existing proven chemistry and sizing up the cells to get significant immediate benefits on existing products.

     
  18. CyberGus

    CyberGus Not Just a Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2020
    Messages:
    712
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    If a battery pack can be charged from 10% to 90% in the same time it takes to fill a gas tank, say 10 minutes, then Range Anxiety Syndrome drops to zero. That's big ask (400 amps! lol) but incremental improvements in charge rate will improve BEV adoption.
     
    • Like x 1
  19. MP3Mike

    MP3Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    14,925
    Location:
    Oregon
    Tesla already runs greater than 600 amps into the packs on the current vehicles, it just ramps down fairly quickly because of heat issues.
     
  20. Swampgator

    Swampgator Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2016
    Messages:
    1,551
    Location:
    Florida
    I think this thing should be able to charge at 3C rate. That means if it's a 200 kwh pack it can charge theoretically the whole pack in 20 min. More likely to 80% in 20 min with taper. 400 miles of range in 15 minutes is pretty damn impressive.
     
    • Like x 2

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC