-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
4680 MYP Acceleration Boost Upgrade prediction.
- Thread starter Blue Magoo
- Start date
I have asked a mod for this subforum to combine this thread with the existing discussion on this topic, which can be found here:
teslamotorsclub.com
Not sure if they will agree with me, but if so, expect to find it in this thread above when they get around to it.
4680 MYP Acceleration Boost Upgrade prediction.
I predict the 4680 MYP will cost and perform the same as with the original batteries, but at sometime in the future those owners will be offered a acceleration boost upgrade at an additional cost. The same as they did with the MY Long range.
teslamotorsclub.com
Not sure if they will agree with me, but if so, expect to find it in this thread above when they get around to it.
E90alex
Active Member
Not until Fremont stops making them with 2170. Can’t have the “same” vehicle being sold at the same time from different factories have different performance.
Bikeman
Member
Yes. No one knows anything yet about battery type related specs of 4680 vs. 2170 in any of their cars. We would all hope something will be better. Maybe in a year we'll know. I didn't wait to find out when I ordered a couple months ago. I just wanted to get things moving.
Watts_Up
Well-Known Member
Also Tesla will certainly be conservative with the first batch (MIA - Made in Austin) about power and charging speed, and improve those later on with OTA.
Tesla don't want to cannibalize sales of other versions, so the LR and the P will still have for a while the 2170, and only the RWD will have the 4680.
I would be curious to know the size of the battery of current MIA RWD?
I imagine that in the future, because of the 4680 higher density,
there might be bigger batteries, like 100 kW for the Model 3/Y and 125 kW for the Model S/X.
Last edited:
X3M Comp and the Alfa Stelvio Quad are both in the 3.1-3.3 range and obliterate the MYP around the track, so plenty of room for improvement believe it or not.
We can cherry pick tests all day, it's 3.3 0-60 here...
BMW X4 M and X3 M Are Insanely Quick
The Bavarian siblings are two of the quickest SUVs we've ever tested.
www.caranddriver.com
I've owned both though and it is noticeably faster.
Time number can vary but you cannot change the race result done by side by side. =)We can cherry pick tests all day, it's 3.3 0-60 here...
BMW X4 M and X3 M Are Insanely Quick
The Bavarian siblings are two of the quickest SUVs we've ever tested.
I've owned both though and it is noticeably faster.
Whatever helps you sleep at night
but the X3Mc is absolutely faster. Nothing to be ashamed of, as that car is a beast.hahah typical BMW driver. I am not saying your number is not correct or X3M is slow. All I am saying is that MYP is faster based on the hard evidence here. I really don't care how fast ICE cars are anymore.Whatever helps you sleep at night
Full disclosure - I sold my X3M Competition to get away from ICE... but it smokes the MYP in every performance metric. Hell it would kill the M3P too.
I'd still go MYP all day though
alexcue
Member
Just wondering, how much does that X3Mc cost???Whatever helps you sleep at night
I paid 73k for mine in Spring of 21. I don't want to deviate from the subject here though. My point was simply that while the MYP is a great performer, there is always room for improvment.
Any proof other than paper spec?Full disclosure - I sold my X3M Competition to get away from ICE... but it smokes the MYP in every performance metric. Hell it would kill the M3P too.
I'd still go MYP all day though
Similar threads
