70D 100% Full Charge

[travwill]

Doing a lot of driving today so just did a 100% charge, first time. I guess it confirms the 240 mile rated range on 70D. Looking forward to the Tesla grin all day ;-)

 

[polything]

Love the app!

 

[mknox]

That's exactly what I get with my bit over 2 year old S85 now (I assume due to battery degradation).

 

[travwill]

That's exactly what I get with my bit over 2 year old S85 now (I assume due to battery degradation).

Yeah it topped out at 243, 100% charge. That is odd for you though I'd say, are you sure its that for yours at 100%? The 70 is 82% the size of the 85, so seems like you would get 18% more, or 285-286 Range Miles at 100%. Can't be that much degradation right, 18% in two years?

 

[AMPUP]

Yeah it topped out at 243, 100% charge. That is odd for you though I'd say, are you sure its that for yours at 100%? The 70 is 82% the size of the 85, so seems like you would get 18% more, or 285-286 Range Miles at 100%. Can't be that much degradation right, 18% in two years?

Ideal vs rated range I'm sure. I suspect the 70 is set to ideal

 

[Max*]

Ideal vs rated range I'm sure. I suspect the 70 is set to ideal

The 70D is rated for 240 miles. I've never charged to 100%, but 242 rated seems reasonable. I've also never looked at what the ideal numbers give me.

 

[Max*]

Ideal vs rated range I'm sure. I suspect the 70 is set to ideal

Just checked my car, 153RM/191 ideal miles @ 64%. So 100% charge ideal miles is ~300?

 

[Bonlaw]

Best I got - rated, not ideal is 138. Not bad at all.

 

[Max*]

Best I got - rated, not ideal is 138. Not bad at all.

I hope you meant 238?

 

[mknox]

Yeah it topped out at 243, 100% charge. That is odd for you though I'd say, are you sure its that for yours at 100%? The 70 is 82% the size of the 85, so seems like you would get 18% more, or 285-286 Range Miles at 100%. Can't be that much degradation right, 18% in two years?

I'm pretty sure it is actual degradation I'm seeing on my S85. I've had it for a bit over 2 years and it currently has a bit over 51,000 miles. I've tried all the tricks: Charge to 100% to "balance" the pack, run it down low and charge back up a few times to "re-calibrate" the mileage estimator etc. but nothing is bringing back any more miles for me. I see around 215 Rated Miles @90% and around 242 @100%. I did get exactly 265 miles @100% when the car was new.

One of the reasons I opted for the 85 over the 60 at the time was in recognition that some degradation would occur over time.

 

[Alysashley79]

Plus with all the different versions of FW we've had since D day two years ago in guessing we probably have more than the car thinks we do. I've got just a bit over 50k on my girl. 232 at 90% and 258 at 100%. Was 269 the day I brought her home.

 

[Bonlaw]

I hope you meant 238?

I did mean the best rated range with full charge was 238.

 

[sahanim]

I'm pretty sure it is actual degradation I'm seeing on my S85. I've had it for a bit over 2 years and it currently has a bit over 51,000 miles. I've tried all the tricks: Charge to 100% to "balance" the pack, run it down low and charge back up a few times to "re-calibrate" the mileage estimator etc. but nothing is bringing back any more miles for me. I see around 215 Rated Miles @90% and around 242 @100%. I did get exactly 265 miles @100% when the car was new.

One of the reasons I opted for the 85 over the 60 at the time was in recognition that some degradation would occur over time.

[1 - (242/265)]x100% = 8.7% degradation over 2 years? thats a pretty hefty amount

 

[mknox]

[1 - (242/265)]x100% = 8.7% degradation over 2 years? thats a pretty hefty amount

Yep.