TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

70kWh Model X? Really?

Discussion in 'Model X: Battery & Charging' started by hill, Nov 24, 2015.

  1. hill

    hill Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2015
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Lake Forest, CA
  2. Merrill

    Merrill Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,093
    Location:
    Sonoma, California
  3. Twiglett

    Twiglett Single pedal driver

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Messages:
    778
    Location:
    Austin
  4. hill

    hill Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2015
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Lake Forest, CA
    ??
    the OP or the link -
    what's the question referencing?.
     
  5. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    10,319
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    The X config page shows that the 70D version can be configured for reservation holders, but note that the stated delivery timeframe is later than the 90D and P90D.
     
  6. Twiglett

    Twiglett Single pedal driver

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Messages:
    778
    Location:
    Austin
    reliability of the source - seems to be Tesla as the source or at least several folks on this board posting screen shots :cool:
     
  7. hill

    hill Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2015
    Messages:
    314
    Location:
    Lake Forest, CA
    #7 hill, Nov 24, 2015
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2015
    Gotcha - when I first read the 1st comments below the OP, the European Community had no such showing on their configuration menu (according to their posts) & as far as I knew, there was going to be no offering below 90 kWh. So, like with the onboard charger confusion I was hoping to see if in fact the offering of a 70 kWh pack was as real as it looked on the Tesla configuration menu .... or if someone was just messing with us vis a vis Photoshop.
    I really can't reconcile that smaller offering in the heavy SUV, as I stated earlier - regardless of whether or not it's something way down the road. Tesla's marketing to date has suggested there was more profit in larger packs, & that more customers were willing/available at a higher cost (bigger pack) than what a lower cost vehicle would yield for the amount of sales.
    .
     
  8. Lex

    Lex Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #8 Lex, Nov 24, 2015
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2015
    SUV today is a family city bus / taxi, not an offroad dirt track or vacation trailer. 70 kwh here makes total sense to me and will stretch the (what I understand is currently a very limited) battery supply.
     
  9. Rodolfo Paiz

    Rodolfo Paiz P85 "Plug and Play"

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
    Messages:
    681
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    The 70 KWh configuration is confirmed, and Tesla will start its deliveries in "mid to late 2016" to ship some of the more profitable cars first.

    The range issue is not a big deal, because this "heavy SUV" is not all that much heavier than what is already a pretty heavy sedan. Energy use ought to be slightly higher, but Tesla is advertising 220 miles of range for the 70 KWh option... essentially enough for all but long-distance travel needs.

    Note that the configuration Tesla cancelled for lack of demand was the 40 KWh battery, not the 60 KWh.
     
  10. goneskiian

    goneskiian Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,986
    Location:
    Bellevue WA
    I'll wager the 70 becomes something larger before actual deliveries of the lower size pack begins. I've seen 75 bandied about as a guess. Sounds about right to me.
     
  11. Drucifer

    Drucifer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Actually the 70 and 90 pack were created in preparation of the Model X coming out so that Model X could have ranges in the ballpark of the then existing Model S 60 and 85.
     
  12. mrdoubleb

    mrdoubleb Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,148
    Location:
    Budapest, Hungary
    Actually, and I am too lazy to google this now, I seem to remember the 60 to 70 jump is just "more of the same", but the 90 has the new enhanced cells.

    I was a bit surprised when they announced the Model X 70 as I was thinking it will be a 75 (with the new cells). Whenever Elon was asked about a cheaper X he was always a little vague and said "something like a 70 is coming out later next year".

    Of course mid 2016 is still far out and they could do a free upgrade to 75 between now and start of production, should that be the original plan.
     
  13. goneskiian

    goneskiian Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,986
    Location:
    Bellevue WA
    Thanks for adding Elon's deleted tweet regarding the size of the smaller pack. Spaced that tidbit. Kinda imprtant though as it's pretty much the basis of the theory that there will be a larger small pack. ;-)
     
  14. Drucifer

    Drucifer Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2014
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    I would like to think if a 75 was going to happen, they would know about it now and set pricing and configurations accordingly. Of course, Tesla has surprised us before, so....
     
  15. vandacca

    vandacca Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    1,945
    Location:
    Hamilton
    In addition, the smaller X70D pack will be more efficient (due to the lower battery weight) than the X90D, just like the Model-S. At 220 miles range, this will be plenty for almost everyone, 98% of the time. Having a 2nd vehicle for the other 2% (or renting) could be an acceptable situation for most.
     

Share This Page