islandbayy
Active Member
Ignorance is bliss. If the customer doesn't complain, they don't need to pony up the expense of a replacement battery or repair.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
islandbayy
Active Member
Thank You
still about 300 gigs of video to edit from last Aprils China trip. I have a Nav by Autopilot video I'm editing, firmware, and slowly working on the video of going to the bottom of the worlds largest coal mine located in my Wifes home city of Fushun Reason for the delay on that one is due to politics, I need to cut out certain parts deemed by the Chinese government to be high-security risk or things that may be "misunderstood" or be "Incorrectly portrayed" to make China be portrayed in a negative way. So need to tip-toe around things a bit. Had to get Provincial Government security clearance for the Coal Mine tour, and wife's uncle pulled a lot of strings and called in a number of favors for me. But it was a neat experience and will have a positive overall ending as the switch to renewable energy increases 
forkee
Member
islandbayy
Active Member
Remote S shows the number higher than canbus. My 90D shows about 77-78 on Remote S, currently showing 75.4 on canbus data.
Just had my pack analyzed last Thursday, while I was not permitted the honor of being shown any actual data, I was told my pack is healthy....
Just had my pack analyzed last Thursday, while I was not permitted the honor of being shown any actual data, I was told my pack is healthy....
With all this news about the even longer range update I had to check. 2016 P90D now has 206 rated miles at 90%, that’s about a 10% loss at 72,000 miles.
On a practical basis it is shy of a comfortable range by about 50 miles in the winter and long trips have a little too much charging time.
Looking back to a year ago there is a bit more loss 90 battery pack degradation
And yes @ByByGas a “90” is really an 83 with about 77 useable
On a practical basis it is shy of a comfortable range by about 50 miles in the winter and long trips have a little too much charging time.
Looking back to a year ago there is a bit more loss 90 battery pack degradation
And yes @ByByGas a “90” is really an 83 with about 77 useable
Last edited:
I agree with you on the winter range reduction. That is my biggest issues with the 90 battery. I'm sitting around 8% degradation at 36,000 miles and if I keep loosing range I'm going to have some issues with distance in the winter.
What I don't get on the 90kWh battery is that on the order sheet it literally says 90kWh battery - $10,000.00 ...
Just looked over my window sticker and it says “90kw Motor”. Sneaky practice to say the least. I find it’s a bit deceptive to say the least how we have 77kw usable battery in an advertised 90kWh battery.
Yup, it sure does. This whole situation sucks either way. Car was sold expecting a 90kWh battery, not a 77kWh battery. I guess it's like hard drive storage space in a way. You buy a 1TB hard drive but that doesn't mean it's the usable space. On my specific car the window sticker is rated at 250mi range. As of last night, at 100% my range is 233. However, is that was only the thing. I have a MX 100D loaner right now. I feel as if I do a 50 mile commute I lose about 50-55 miles of range, even driving a little spirited. However, on my P90D if I were to do the same I feel like I lose 75-80 miles worth of range for the same 50 mile commute. I guess it's the "Performance" motor that really does draw that much more juice despite driving tame. The 22" wheels is another factor I suppose.
Do we know what the actual battery is in the 75, 85, 100? Are they are misrepresented as well?
The 22” wheels are a big factor. My X90D consumes about 320Wh/mi under regular driving conditions, which is right in line with the estimated consumption. But that’s separate from the residual capacity of the pack, which has dropped significantly but seems to be leveling off. My most recent trip required a 100% charge and I achieved 240 miles, the same as last summer. Good news I suppose..
Maybe, but not really. Model X 100D not 100kWh battery This is why T moved away from pack size as model designation—they never were really enumerating the pack capacity. Range is dependent on so many other things (witness the S and X update just announced). But if part of the EPA range is the tire tread design then all bets are off as soon as you add a winter tire or change one of the many other parameters.
SMSMD
Active Member
Model X 2016 vin:5YJXCBE25GF010...
Unintended 100% charge .Forgot to turn down the charging slider.Took out immediately for a spin.
385Km= 239 miles =100% charging (was 405km=251 miles when new)
82,076km=51,000 miles odometer reading.
Suprised to see regeneration at 100%charging, Is regeneration at 100% charging something new ?
I have software version 2019.12.11.
Unintended 100% charge .Forgot to turn down the charging slider.Took out immediately for a spin.
385Km= 239 miles =100% charging (was 405km=251 miles when new)
82,076km=51,000 miles odometer reading.
Suprised to see regeneration at 100%charging, Is regeneration at 100% charging something new ?
I have software version 2019.12.11.
My wife is taking her Model X in for several small service issues this week and we're asking for an evaluation of the pack as well. I think we're getting around 220mi at 100% at 66k miles on the 90D. So it's a bit frustrating to have it that low, esp. in this part of the country, she may even have to stop and charge on the way to the service center this week...
Similar threads
