Given that phantom breaking is in and of itself, dangerous, and
under the assumption that phantom breaking is caused by the car incorrectly assuming that the structure of an overpass is an object with which a collision could take place,
Cull the data from vehicles showing this pattern, check that there is an overpass there, and tell the car NOT TO DO THAT.
Teaching the car “hey, there is an overpass here so don’t consider something physical in those few feet something you would break for” seems obviously worth it on the whole. That would turn off forward collision actions for what, .005% of the time?
What am I missing here?
Thanks.
under the assumption that phantom breaking is caused by the car incorrectly assuming that the structure of an overpass is an object with which a collision could take place,
Cull the data from vehicles showing this pattern, check that there is an overpass there, and tell the car NOT TO DO THAT.
Teaching the car “hey, there is an overpass here so don’t consider something physical in those few feet something you would break for” seems obviously worth it on the whole. That would turn off forward collision actions for what, .005% of the time?
What am I missing here?
Thanks.