@RobStark
This back and forth between you and me is based on a misreading on my part of your first post.
I should have started out by writing something like this instead:
The Communist and the Fascist can make a compelling case that virtually all your actions affect others.
How much and what you eat affects healthcare cost.
What you drive affects the price of oil which directly affects the national economy.
How many children you have affects the near future of the economy.
Are we left with only the freedom to be perfect?
Why do you drag Fascists and Communists into this? Isn’t it obvious that individual actions affect others?
…/ Are we left with only the freedom to be perfect?
No. You’re left with the freedom to not deliberately hurt other people.
But since we also ended up here:
You seem to be splitting the Communist and Fascist. Same thing. The total state just different rhetoric.
The case for the total state controlling our choices is everywhere.
Elites deciding logically what is the best choice and imposing it on every one by force of the state always seems prudent on the surface.
I don’t know how you, and the people around you think, but in the national public discourse in Sweden – making a very clear distinction between on one hand the
underlying ideology that is called Communism, and on the other hand the
underlying ideology that is called Fascism –
is about as uncontroversial as it gets.
Why do you think Communism
as an idea was so compelling that it came from nowhere and toppled the ruling regime in the largest country on earth?
It’s because
the starting point – the Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels published in 1848 – was basically a dream about a society where all human beings – women as well as men – had the same value, and that everyone had the right to be free. A society where everyone, every worker, had a say.
Now in reality –
that did not end up becoming the end result. The end result was just another version of an authoritarian dictatorship where basically one man ended up deciding everything. So they basically ended up in same place where they started.
And because all of this coincided with previously unprecedented technological advancements, the consequences of the actions of that one man, ended up being on a completely different scale than anything previously in history. Arguably though with the exception of the consequences that followed from the actions of Hitler and whoever were instrumental in his rise to power in Germany[SUP]1[/SUP].
But
do you honestly believe that this end result was what they all dreamt about when they set out?
Regarding Fascism: The underlying ideology behind Spain under Franco, or Italy under Mussolini, was something completely different.
[SUP]1[/SUP]And it’s possible that imperial Japan leading up to WWII, and also all the western colonial powers deserve to be mentioned here as well, but my knowledge of this period of history is unfortunately currently somewhat limited.