You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Simple.
Lock your phone in your car by putting your phone in airplane mode.
Model S owner here. The fobs do not always work. I have an iphone and it seems to be more reliable honestly. The fob is better for summon though. Still waiting to see if model 3 fobs support summon....Because walking to your car and fiddling with your phone or opening the app when the car doesn't realize you are there or not connected is annoying. A fob always works.
Model X fob uses Bluetooth and is not susceptible to this attack. I’d think the model 3 uses the same BT technology (as phone as key works over BTLE). So who knows what they are doing.I wonder if the feature for passive entry is there, but they just don't want to enable it yet as they try to figure out how to make it more secure. Either that or they just don't want it to drain too much battery.....in either case it sucks.
Here's the issue with passive entry and a model s being stolen.
According to commentator on electek, its a battery life thing:Model X fob uses Bluetooth and is not susceptible to this attack. I’d think the model 3 uses the same BT technology (as phone as key works over BTLE). So who knows what they are doing.
There are no key fobs on the market that work using Bluetooth. They use common RF bands, and the "passive entry fobs" communicate through challenge response. The car MUST have radio transmitters and receivers capable of sending RF challenges when the handle is pressed, so the key fob can send the response. The car's multiple RF receivers MUST be able to use signal strength and triangulation to determine if the key fob is on the driver side door, passenger, rear, or inside.
Notice, the car needs to have specific hardware that the Model 3 simply wasn't designed for.
This new key fob would be the first Bluetooth key fob in the market. And it is Bluetooth LE per the FCC application.
Passive RF key fobs, like we are all used to... are VERY low power. They sit listening only, no beacons, no heavy protocols, etc. Much lower power requirements than even Bluetooth Low Energy. A phone is charged everyday, but a fob must last for months if not years.
So this key fob is more of a workaround. It has to use Bluetooth, because the car's hardware doesn't transmit or receive on any other frequencies or protocols. And BLE still requires too much power if active all the time, as it would need to be in a "passive entry" mode. Even a BT beacon interval of 5 seconds would drain the battery too fast, and though 1 minute intervals might save the battery, it won't work walking up to a car.
So, it must use Bluetooth only when the button is pressed.
Love the technical sleuthing on the Internet, though maybe we could use some data...According to commentator on electek, its a battery life thing:
Presuming you have your car annually serviced by Tesla, likely will replace the battery for any fobs in the car... well, at least they do for S/XIf that was the case (6-15 months), I'd much rather swap CR2032's regularly (you can buy a 10 pack at Ikea for $3), which would more than sufficient....
My Spark EV's battery went bad after 30 months, my wife's Mercedes went bad after only 18 months.
Yes, it seems it would be feasible to triangle the 2D position of the fob/phone. I was/am surprised this isn’t done to reduce the waking up from car being asleep. 5-10 meter range from a garage within a house means the car is continually believing it needs to be awake. This was much more noticeable when we had Auto Unlock/mirrors.It's interesting that the Model 3 phone key seems to work backwards from how a BLE passive entry fob would work. I.e. the car advertises the BLE beacons (4 of them), and the phone listens for any one of the beacons. Whereas traditionally with a key fob, the fob is the beacon and the car listens for the fob.
Presuming you have your car annually serviced by Tesla, likely will replace the battery for any fobs in the car... well, at least they do for S/X
Re service pricing. It does seem inordinately high, to the point where it was previously referred to as the most expensive wiper blade and fob battery replacement ever. As they started to indicate the amount of labor time, checks, etc done it made more sense; though agree the promise of significantly reduced servicing costs for EVs still appears to be unproven. I am speaking from S experience. I don’t know what the 3 service will cost.On this note, I'm not a fan of Tesla's service schedule and pricing. It really kicks into the "save money on maintenace" aspect of EVs. I never had to worry about it much on my previous EVs but Tesla's pricing are well above competitor maintenance schedules.
Back on the FOB note, I don't see myself paying a dealer $$$ for what amounts to a $0.40 part and 30 seconds of work to swap a cell.
Confirmed that the key fob for the Model 3 is very limited in capability. It will not summon,