0 to ~45 mph is not affected by battery level.Also, 0-60 power is the same regardless of SOC. It’s only effected in higher speeds so I’m told. I may be wrong.
Last edited:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
0 to ~45 mph is not affected by battery level.Also, 0-60 power is the same regardless of SOC. It’s only effected in higher speeds so I’m told. I may be wrong.
I did some test runs with my Dragy GPS unit about a week ago to establish a baseline prior to the software update and now I'm just waiting for the software update.
0 to ~45 mph is not affected by battery level.
We’re starting to split hairs here because those runs are all very close below 45mph. That test seems like it had some methodology challenges to be able to discern that kind of difference though. You’ve likely seen this yt video from MPP. It’s much more controlled and shows the overlaping power at different SOCs below about 45 mph.yes it is, here's the data to prove it. It's not a large effect but it's absolutely there
Both produce reasonably good numbers, but they're each for completely different use cases. Racelogic's products are geared toward actual data logging and performance tracking purposes. Dragy, on the other hand, is more of a fun social app/device than it is a diagnostic tool, it doesn't give users the depth of information that a vbox can, but it does seem to be similarly accurate for what it does do and it's not particularly expensive.How do you feel about Dragy vs Vbox?
Both produce reasonably good numbers, but they're each for completely different use cases. Racelogic's products are geared toward actual data logging and performance tracking purposes. Dragy, on the other hand, is more of a fun social app/device than it is a diagnostic tool, it doesn't give users the depth of information that a vbox can, but it does seem to be similarly accurate for what it does do and it's not particularly expensive.
The dot in the regenerating side means the battery is too cold. Dots on the power side means the battery is too hot to give maximum power.
Also, 0-60 power is the same regardless of SOC. It’s only effected in higher speeds so I’m told. I may be wrong.
View attachment 390893 View attachment 390894
This is my P3D- on stock tires. 3.49 to 3.35. My “lauch area” is not straight, and I did get some wheel slip, but my first try after the update was 0.14s faster that my previous fastest.
View attachment 390893 View attachment 390894
This is my P3D- on stock tires. 3.49 to 3.35. My “lauch area” is not straight, and I did get some wheel slip, but my first try after the update was 0.14s faster that my previous fastest.
Posted this in another thread, but attaching a before/after P3D dyno plot thanks to English Racing on FB.
Power is identical until peak around 45mph where it's ~3% higher. The gap then widens to an average of maybe 5-7% more than before at higher rpms. My 0-60 run below (3.16sec) coincides with this as it's only 0.02 seconds faster than previously ran, likely due to the only difference being 12-15hp more power from 45-60mph.
View attachment 391081 View attachment 391082
Alright, finally some numbers with the 2019.8.3 update with the same vehicle configuration as last time and a ~68°F ambient temp:Again, this is pre-update, at about 90% state of charge, battery warmed up, ~72°F ambient temp, 18" Aero wheels with stock MXM4 tires:
0-60 with 1' rollout: 3.21 seconds
0-60 without rollout: 3.39 seconds
60-80: 2.03 seconds
I posted the 0-60 screenshots on Twitter: Alex Venz on Twitter
nice.. im sure someone would be able to bust a 3.09Alright, finally some numbers with the 2019.8.3 update with the same vehicle configuration as last time and a ~68°F ambient temp:
0-60 with 1' rollout: 3.11 seconds
0-60 without rollout: 3.28 seconds
60-80: 2.00 seconds (The best I've gotten so far on v2019.8.3 was 1.99 seconds, but that was on a different run with a slightly slower 0-60. The car generally runs this test at 2.00-2.05 seconds before & after the update, so I'm not counting this as a real improvement.)
Like last time, screenshots are on Twitter: Alex Venz on Twitter
It's weird that the car did about 0.02 seconds better than before at each step of the run in 10mph breakout that Dragy provides--suggests a more even boost than some are seeing?
All times recorded with the Dragy GPS unit.
Upgraded this afternoon. Have just over 10k miles on the car. Seat of the pants, feels like it launches harder. When I floored it from a dead stop I noticed the the forward upper part of the factory all weather mat on the passenger side had flopped backward and was laying flat folded back on itself. That has never happened to me before and I'm not shy about unleashing the car when circumstances allow!
View attachment 394272
I think you are a fortunate guy! 11/100ths improvement is much better than most, and you had a great time to begin with. I only got 4/100ths improvement no-rollout time of 3.42s -> 3.38sAlright, finally some numbers with the 2019.8.3 update with the same vehicle configuration as last time and a ~68°F ambient temp:
0-60 with 1' rollout: 3.11 seconds
0-60 without rollout: 3.28 seconds
60-80: 2.00 seconds (The best I've gotten so far on v2019.8.3 was 1.99 seconds, but that was on a different run with a slightly slower 0-60. The car generally runs this test at 2.00-2.05 seconds before & after the update, so I'm not counting this as a real improvement.)
Like last time, screenshots are on Twitter: Alex Venz on Twitter
It's weird that the car did about 0.02 seconds better than before at each step of the run in 10mph breakout that Dragy provides--suggests a more even boost than some are seeing?
All times recorded with the Dragy GPS unit.