Um, no.
Jim: This car is great. It has everything I need. Except I think it should have solar panels under the battery.
Joe: Yeah, the car is great.
Jim: See you're agreeing with me.
Joe: Um, no.
LOL, but Joe, you said, and I quote, 'Yeah, the car is great'. seems like you're confused :tongue:
- - - Updated - - -
Thanks for the example.
I understand you'd like us to have no opinion, but on-going feedback seems to indicate that the majority of TMC is happy with the way it's been going. From a business perspective, if membership were declining because of unhappiness over this issue, it would have to change. But the messages I've seen indicate that a large number of people LIKE this forum precisely because of the moderation.
Absolutely NOT what I said. What I said was that moderators should moderate (doesn't mean you shouldn't have an opinion), doing so, can put participants in an uncomfortable position given the position of the moderator, which brianman pointed out he could name a number of times when exactly that happened, and I quote, "I'm not sure what can/should be done about it, and it certainly hasn't been a problem generally but I can definitely think of specific examples where the lines have gotten uncomfortably blurry"
And there's is nothing disingenuous about me posting that most sites moderators have a delineation of duties, not disingenuous at all given that just as you all can say you belong to a number of site's where that's not the case, I can, and do belong to sites where there is a clear delineation (as well as having set up sites with such rules).