TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Article on the new COPVs and Block 5

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by Grendal, May 24, 2018.

  1. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    4,356
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    • Informative x 3
  2. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    5,453
    Location:
    San Diego
    Who knows, NASA might relax the 7 flight requirement as long as the other flights have the new COPV. It sounds like it’s a fluid situation.
     
    • Like x 1
  3. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    6,935
    Location:
    Michigan
    I wonder how NASA is going to decide what counts toward the 7 flights... 7 new rockets one time each, one rocket 7 times, 7 rockets 7 times? Or will they start with requiring first flight rockets, then as Block 5s get 2 uses, they'll allow reuse, then triple...
     
  4. e-FTW

    e-FTW New electron smell

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2015
    Messages:
    1,878
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
  5. Nikxice

    Nikxice Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    586
    Location:
    Hudson, NH
    It doesn't appear SpaceX will have much trouble making those 7 crew config proving flights between August and December. They'll also have to squeeze in their in-flight abort test, which is likely to occur around October. Even if the commercial crew flight is pushed out into 2019, I'm still betting on SpaceX to fly astronauts before Boeing.

    Loren's article rehashes a bunch of the load and go FUD. There's been a lot of scrutiny because it's not the norm and the aforementioned COPV issue. It would be nice if the media investigated the alternative method of fueling, you know the one where the astronauts ride up on an elevator next to a rocket holding the equivalent of a million pounds of TNT. Instead, just maybe those astronauts would feel a little more at ease protected inside the Dragon capsule during the fueling process. Perhaps that method would also provide less risk to ground crew technicians. NASA's always been aware of the danger of exposing humans to a fully fueled rocket. It's the reason why they have only ever allowed essential personal to be at the launch pad during closeouts.

    The astronaut office will have significant influence on the final decision concerning load and go. It's their hide on the ride and I'm confident they're going to give SpaceX a thumbs up. Even in the unlikely event of a pad RUD, the crew will still experience the same happy ending splashdown as the original mission plan. Albeit sooner than expected, the Dragon 2 will get plucked up from the waters of the Atlantic having suffered no casualties.
     
    • Like x 4
    • Love x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC