This one looks promising if they actually deliver.
http://www.businessinsider.com/audi-etron-quattro-concept-specs-features-photos-2015-9?op=0
http://www.businessinsider.com/audi-etron-quattro-concept-specs-features-photos-2015-9?op=0
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My bad. I missed that story when it originally ran and today it popped up on Flipboard. Should have checked the date before I posted.You do realize that this is three months old, right? Regarding the "latest" in your post title...
I love these types of statements:
"With its 95 kWh battery, the e-tron quattro has an impressive range of 310 miles on a single charge. Tesla’s Model X SUV has a range of 240 miles on a single charge."
I see. Tesla's car on the road has 240 miles of range but Audi's car, that only exists as a prototype, and won't go into production until 2018, get's better range. Yet it can't even take me to the corner store and, of course, Tesla will have the same range in 2018 as it's current cars (sarcasm). Yes, that's really impressive range compared to Tesla.
Don't get me wrong. This is good news and the more EV's being made the better, but statements like that are really idiotic journalism.
I suspect the S90D will go over 310 on the NEDC driving cycle.
AUDI is full of NOX, I mean hot air.
I think it's more cynicism after all the major car makers have done to forestall the advent of EVs, and when they do make EVs it's little more than a token effort, to do the bare minimum necessary to make compliance cars.I don't understand the glee of people. In order for the EV transformation to work we need many more vendors to build competitive EVs. There is no way that Tesla can serve the whole market.
So we all should cheer for major car makers to get into this market.
That I feel as well. I've been going from dealer to dealer over the past few months and have driven every single EV for sale in the US and most of the recent PHEVs.I think it's more cynicism after all the major car makers have done to forestall the advent of EVs, and when they do make EVs it's little more than a token effort, to do the bare minimum necessary to make compliance cars.
It feels that way because it's true. Although they may make something to sell to the committed EV enthusiast, it's not in their interest to make a car that will attract mainstream buyers and cannabilize their ICE sales. The legacy auto makers have too much invested in ICE to want EVs to become successful, and that's not even mentioning the interests of their dealers who need ICE dominance to continue in order to survive.That I feel as well. I've been going from dealer to dealer over the past few months and have driven every single EV for sale in the US and most of the recent PHEVs.
Tesla has no competition. Absolutely nothing. Not even with a generous helping of goodwill and desire to buy a different car. It does indeed feel as if the other car makers are intentionally sabotaging the chances of their EVs.
I don't understand the glee of people.
Yes, I cheer every auto manufacturer press release about the incredible EV they plan to make, someday, and every concept EV they show, many of which will likely never be seen again. So far, after over 7 years of Tesla actually manufacturing long range EVs, no other car company has put one into production.So we all should cheer for major car makers to get into this market.
So true. So sad and so true.It feels that way because it's true. Although they may make something to sell to the committed EV enthusiast, it's not in their interest to make a car that will attract mainstream buyers and cannabilize their ICE sales. The legacy auto makers have too much invested in ICE to want EVs to become successful, and that's not even mentioning the interests of their dealers who need ICE dominance to continue in order to survive.
I completely agree. The "Tesla Killer" headlines are just too funny. And the strained comparisons (here, let's compare a fictitious, ideal range of a non existing future car with the actual realistic range of a Tesla shipping since last year).I think it has something to do with every other article proclaiming the next "TESLA KILLER", not to mention years of simply saying Tesla is a pipe dream doomed to fail. So forgive us our glee when the "TESLA KILLERS" have no teeth. Eventually they will, though by then I don't think they'll be capable of causing any serious damage to Tesla.
(my bold)Yes, I cheer every auto manufacturer press release about the incredible EV they plan to make, someday, and every concept EV they show, many of which will likely never be seen again. So far, after over 7 years of Tesla actually manufacturing long range EVs, no other car company has put one into production.
I am expecting 2016 to be the year that changes, with the GM Bolt (and then GM has to persuade their dealers to seriously promote them, and good luck with that). And then maybe in 2017 we might see one or two more long range EVs. We hope...