Exactly. Anyone who suggests that AP2 is equivalent to AP1 is lying to you or has consumed far too much Kool Aid or both.
I've got 50,000 miles driving AP1 and 10,000 miles driving AP2 from coast to coast and back again with a variety of road types and conditions.
TACC remains the best feature available. And even that is remarkably poor with AP2 compared to AP1. As just one simple example, it will engage and then disengage as you approach stopped traffic - not fun.
If you've never experienced AP, then AP2 is nifty, if decidedly unrefined. At least until the brakes are applied arbitrarily and forcefully in traffic - which happens every day since the last regression, er, update.
If you've experienced AP1 across a variety of conditions and roads, then you know how much of a disappointment AP2 is by comparison.
And it's not close.
At this stage (less than a year in w AP2) that would ordinarily be fine. The *larger* concern is that AP2 may never equal AP1 - and that's a substantial problem. A solvable problem with AP3, perhaps - but that's a different discussion.
Those of us that bought into AP2 will probably be offered FSD refunds. The question becomes "Is that enough?" given the regression that is EAP under AP2 compared to AP1. Difficult to justify paying more to get less when shown, for example, a video purporting more, and when told by management that parity will be achieved over half a year ago.
If the expectations hadn't been set and used as a basis for purchase, then no harm, no foul. Regrettably, that's not what happened for a significant number of now not happy Tesla owners.
And no amount of spin by Tesla fanboys will change that reality. But they will no doubt be compelled to try.