This post was very informative, I have seen some of this before but this is much more complete. I think we all believed that similar quality EV will have a higher residual value then cars in or out of its class or segment. I would really love to see Model 3 vs a Camry or Accord because I know those cars hold their value and I believe Model 3 would be very competitive. Corolla here as a proxy of sorts shows how well the Camry might hold its value.
There was also an article today on CNBC that talks about how rapid drop in residual value or used car values are going to accelerate EV adoption because it changes the equation even though the EV costs more up front it has a much higher residual value and maybe the ICEv has only scrap value in 5-10 years from today. Depending on how long you keep a car, EV might be the smartest option no matter if it is out of your budget today:
JPMorgan thinks the electric vehicle revolution will create a lot of losers
The charts in the original post just look at 100,000 miles, I think the differences shown will only start to grow exponentially after 100,000 miles when ICEv costs of ownership skyrocket and EVs are still fairly cheap to maintain. The only major issue I see is battery replacement, but do we think you will be able to get a model 3 pack replacement for 1/2 the price you can today or even a 1/3 the price?
Because these cars will last longer and because of things like Tesla Network, we should only need about half as many cars, but you will also see people with no transportation today be able to afford a 10 year of Model 3 with a new pack and Tesla Network will enable more people to have access to transportation so that should double the demand leading to a flatting of the demand for cars over the next 10-20 years. By then, EVs would be so affordable to own or share that Tesla could actually have some problems. Hopefully by then, they will be dominating all the energy generation and utilities.