So, considering that Mercede's driver assist tech allows for manual lane change without disengaging, I would like to see Tesla add this functionality into AP.
Basically, I feel like AP is *too* limited since, unless you never pass anyone, it must be disengaged too often, and in a very non user friendly way.
Here are my specific gripes. AP is engaged, but I approach slower traffic and want to pass. I have to really yank the wheel to disengage which makes for a jerky, non-smooth drive. In addition, I lose cruise control so now must also manually maintain speed. If it is going to take some time to pass a slower moving clump of traffic, now I have to re-engage AP. Then, once passing is complete, I have to yank the wheel, jerk around, lose cruise control, change lanes, then reengage AP. This is way too clunky and not user friendly at all.
I'm not saying the car should self drive lane changes and such....this is a feature of EAP that Tesla understandably wants to be paid for. However, it would be nice if, after using turn signal, AP would allow for manual lane change without losing CC, and automatically resume control once the lane change is made. After passing, the driver could again manually change lanes, retain cruise control, and AP re-engage after lane change. This is pretty basic capability that many other companies are offering at a much lower cost than Tesla's EAP.
Maybe Tesla considers this too close to EAP and doesn't want to hurt revenue, but IMO, AP is far too basic and limited, and EAP is far too expensive let alone FSD.
For comparison sake, Mercedes' driver assist program does allow this capability and only costs $2k. AND, AFAIK, it will also auto lane change on its own with no driver assist just as EAP does(doesn't it??).
I don't think this capability would eat too heavily into EAP or FSD sales....there are lots of folks like me who will never dream of spending $6k for EAP. I would pay $500 for a software update that would allow the above capability to change lanes manually. Heck, I'd probably pay $1,000.
Pre-emptively, please spare the "just buy EAP or FSD" comments. It's not worth 6k when others are giving this functionality for far less.
Basically, I feel like AP is *too* limited since, unless you never pass anyone, it must be disengaged too often, and in a very non user friendly way.
Here are my specific gripes. AP is engaged, but I approach slower traffic and want to pass. I have to really yank the wheel to disengage which makes for a jerky, non-smooth drive. In addition, I lose cruise control so now must also manually maintain speed. If it is going to take some time to pass a slower moving clump of traffic, now I have to re-engage AP. Then, once passing is complete, I have to yank the wheel, jerk around, lose cruise control, change lanes, then reengage AP. This is way too clunky and not user friendly at all.
I'm not saying the car should self drive lane changes and such....this is a feature of EAP that Tesla understandably wants to be paid for. However, it would be nice if, after using turn signal, AP would allow for manual lane change without losing CC, and automatically resume control once the lane change is made. After passing, the driver could again manually change lanes, retain cruise control, and AP re-engage after lane change. This is pretty basic capability that many other companies are offering at a much lower cost than Tesla's EAP.
Maybe Tesla considers this too close to EAP and doesn't want to hurt revenue, but IMO, AP is far too basic and limited, and EAP is far too expensive let alone FSD.
For comparison sake, Mercedes' driver assist program does allow this capability and only costs $2k. AND, AFAIK, it will also auto lane change on its own with no driver assist just as EAP does(doesn't it??).
I don't think this capability would eat too heavily into EAP or FSD sales....there are lots of folks like me who will never dream of spending $6k for EAP. I would pay $500 for a software update that would allow the above capability to change lanes manually. Heck, I'd probably pay $1,000.
Pre-emptively, please spare the "just buy EAP or FSD" comments. It's not worth 6k when others are giving this functionality for far less.