Has anyone seen any real world posts about the 0-60 on the AWD non-performance? Just curious how it compares to my X 90D, also curious to see if people are getting better or worse than advertised.
AWD Non-performance 0-60 tests?
- Thread starter clyjr
- Start date
I'd like to see some passing performance tests as well (e.g. 30-60)
I was quite surprised how much slower a "faster" Model S felt hitting it at 50 MPH compared to an AWD M3. I think the AWD MYs will really shine when already rolling. It seems that the 0-30 is software limited to be very fast instead of crazy fast unless we pony up the extra $8k for the performance model
I was quite surprised how much slower a "faster" Model S felt hitting it at 50 MPH compared to an AWD M3. I think the AWD MYs will really shine when already rolling. It seems that the 0-30 is software limited to be very fast instead of crazy fast unless we pony up the extra $8k for the performance model
Perception of acceleration can be very deceiving. As an example, a sudden increase in torque feels much faster than a higher torque being applied very evenly, even when the latter could be faster overall.
I am curious to know as well.
My MYP PUP has done as low as 3.4 with 1ft roll out but otherwise its very consistent 3.5-3.6 like what Tesla advertises.
My MYP PUP has done as low as 3.4 with 1ft roll out but otherwise its very consistent 3.5-3.6 like what Tesla advertises.
Croathlete
Member
A lot more base AWD Model Y's have been delivered since the last reply to this thread. Has anyone seen some accurate 0-60 runs?
Also curious to see if there's a difference between the "E" and "F" versions of the base AWD.
Also curious to see if there's a difference between the "E" and "F" versions of the base AWD.
I had a model S 75D loaner and it felt quicker. Could be just perception but it sure sends my neck snappy back with ease...
Nothing scientific but I pushed the pedal on my Dual Motor Y and hit 100 before I realized. Oops.
I wish I could chime in with a number but having owned several sports cars (modded and stock), the Long Range Y on my test drive was PLENTY quick! My full-bolt on 335i may have been barely quicker but traction was always an issue. AWD would have whooped it off the line and ofcourse with an EV, no downshifting when passing 30-60.
I haven't timed it... the numbers go so fast, it will be tough. Judging by the smiles of everyone who's floored mine, it's pretty fast!
Torque (on Android) can measure 0-60. Not sure how accurate it is though... it uses GPS for speed (I don't think there is an ODB2 port). I just did 3 tests... 7.0, 5.0, 2.0. By my count it was about 5, so I think they're pretty close to the advertised 4.8.
Torque (on Android) can measure 0-60. Not sure how accurate it is though... it uses GPS for speed (I don't think there is an ODB2 port). I just did 3 tests... 7.0, 5.0, 2.0. By my count it was about 5, so I think they're pretty close to the advertised 4.8.
Last edited:
This just came out recently on 0-60 times, and even a comparison between Ys
Young Phenom
Member
Even if the LR AWD didn't have the uberturbines, it still had the 20" wheels, which I imagine aren't that much lighter. I wonder if there are other contributing factors.
Yep, in the real world having instantaneous power and 4wd traction will make it faster than almost any ICE car in real world driving situation unless on the autobahn. I had a Hellcat and it was so frustrating to not be able to put the power down until over 60 mph. I'm scheduled to get me MY LR this month, can't wait.
I wanted it but wife didn't....so.....we get the LR
THe reduced range was a factor. We are getting the tri motor Cybertruck for speed.
