Not to tesla but maybe to that OA or DSThe 'tit for tat' thing seems childish to me but then again I'm not in your position.
Also, I doubt one less Q3 vehicle will mean much, if anything.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to tesla but maybe to that OA or DSThe 'tit for tat' thing seems childish to me but then again I'm not in your position.
Also, I doubt one less Q3 vehicle will mean much, if anything.
I used to be in that position in tech companies. I moved from for profit to non profit at 40 and now never have to deal with those integrity issues.
And I find that generalization to be offensive.
This entire thread is beyond ridiculous IMHO... You aren't buying a car from a traditional car dealership where sticker price is a suggestion... You're buying something with an essentially fixed price. Those of you who have already ordered, you agreed to buy a specific car at a specific price and put a deposit down for Tesla to build that specific car you agreed to buy. Tesla doesn't owe you anything, nor should you have the expectation that they "work with you" either. Tesla is free to apply temporary discounts to already built cars it wants to sell but that has nothing to do with the car YOU ordered and that YOU agreed to purchase at the pre-agreed upon price.
Given the very real financial constraints Tesla is still operating under, as an investor (long on TSLA), I have no problems with Tesla keeping your deposits should you attempt to pull this run around and quite frankly, if it were me, I'd black list you for a period of time for doing so. Tesla doesn't need customers ordering cars they don't intend to actually buy.
Jeff
Come on.. When we ordered the car we were all under the assumed there was no haggling.. shortly after that they haggle. I don';t really care, but you have to see everyone point. It hurts the value of the $100,000 purchase... especially when they come out with new hardware and we all go to sell or trade in.
If you want to support Tesla, pay the price agreed upon when ordering. If you learned something this time around, wait for the last month of a quarter and get the deals. The value of custom ordering, getting the vin email, the production emails and talking it up on the web here is worth at least $3000 of the price. Buying a car on the lot lowers the experience factors. And should cost less.
With the week downtime at start of October, it is possible that after that, AP 2.0 comes out and everyone is missing out on the new stuff anyway, no matter what the price was.
Consumers are buying a product at a fixed price with the expectation that Tesla will keep their end of the agreement.
Instead, Tesla has violated their "we never discount" commitment.
Tesla should acknowledge this and provide consumers the same discount they or return the consumers deposit.
And if others pay less?
1) not equal
2) hurts the after sale value of the asset
Update: I called in today just to make sure my delivery specialist knew I was bumping delivery to next week since he never replied to my emails. I just didn't want him to be waiting for me at the delivery appointment. Turns out he has been out sick (should have forwarded calls to another DS or at least setup an email auto-response but being out sick is definitely understandable). So, I spoke to a different delivery person and they waived the destination/document fee without any hesitation after I explained my experience with my owner advisor. I'm not going to name him/her but if you have an owner advisor at the Marietta, GA location and aren't finding them helpful, just ask to switch to a new person. It seems most (if not all) of the Tesla employees at that location are less than helpful.
Anyway, since they agreed to waive the fee, I'll be heading over to Atlanta later this week to take delivery.
Basically, what I've learned thus far with Tesla is that the people at the Marietta location completely suck. I've had to switch both my OA and DS from that location. Everyone at the Decatur, GA location is awesome though.
Well, hopefully any issues I have will be minor. My last few cars have been BMWs and if you just include the last car, I've had fuel pumps, turbos, an exhaust vacuum system, a radio, an antenna amp, a headlight, a taillight, a seat, a seat heater, a steering wheel and numerous "modules" replaced. So as long as something like a door doesn't literally fall off the Tesla, I'm not going to be phased much.
I realize they don't owe me anything.
My last BMW was a 2011 550i. 2011 was a major redesign for the 550i and mine was one of the first vehicles off the line. I don't know if they rushed those early cars or what but it definitely had "issues". BMW never would acknowledge it was a lemon but it's funny how in March of 2011 they quietly introduced an "updated" 2011 550i. They then extended my warranty to eight years.Dang, you certainly had your share of issues with BMW. I had 4 BMW, 3 year leased cars in a row and was only in the shop for 1 very minor issue during those 12 years
Yeah, I'm definitely happy about getting "my car" with the options I chose. However, black paint was my original choice before I was talked out of it, I actually like the default trim and the only other thing the inventory cars I looked at lacked compared to mine was the premium package. I could have lived without that. My OA played the whole "but this is YOUR car" card pretty hard but apparently didn't bother to notice that "my" car is a low-specced grocery getter (which is all I need it for).I think I would have been disappointed if I got the inventory car with out the options I wanted.
Ok. No more hijacking of this post by me...aside from this!Doesn't your post above insinuate that if you were not working for a non-profit that you'd have to compromise your integrity? Is that not a generalization?
My wife worked in non-profits for many years. It sickened us how much good intentioned money was spent on those running the society, rather than the target, and how the law allowed for it -- it was all perfectly legal. And these are not some small unknown societies. It sickened her too, and she quit and worked for another one where the board members and other executives and employees, paid out of pocket for travel expenses, meals, etc., rather than take away from the target. That is aside from "bonuses" and excessive salaries for sitting on your hands, which she watched a lot of people do, if they even came in the office. Yes, I generalized, but it doesn't take away from my argument.
Unethical behavior remains a persistent problem in nonprofits and for-profits alike... the corporate sector has no monopoly on greed.