TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Battery aging / degradation over time

Discussion in 'Model S: Battery & Charging' started by wga22, Sep 14, 2015.

  1. wga22

    wga22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    Could some of the longer term owners post the degradation of their range over time? Are they seeing 5% annual loss? What range does their battery have after a few years?

    IS 90% range the best way to get consistent results here?
     
  2. Troy

    Troy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    451
    Location:
    Hi,

    Here is the data you want. The chart is from THIS battery survey. If you enter your data, you can then go to charts page and select your username and it will show your entry in a different color on this chart. This way you can easily see if you are below or above the red trendline which shows the average.

    nWM9ZrS.gif
     
  3. David99

    David99 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    Messages:
    2,055
    Location:
    Brea, Orange County
    We can clearly see a loss of capacity over time/use and definitely different numbers on vehicles with identical mileage. It's all expected. What is unexpected and encouraging is how the average shows that the loss degradation is slowing down and it seems to almost flatten out. In other words, everyone sees a loss of about 5% over the first 50k km and then only maybe 1% over the next 50k km.
     
  4. wga22

    wga22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    thank you for the quick replies. I see the chart is done by distance, and wonder if its really age that is more of a factor. Either way, I agree, the battery ages similar to what we see in our cell phones that there is a quick fall off, then plateaus, as the chemistry of the batteries stabilize.
     
  5. David99

    David99 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    Messages:
    2,055
    Location:
    Brea, Orange County
    Batteries definitely age both through time and use as well as temperature. All things factor in. Time alone seems to be a small factor. I remember a professor talking about Lithium batteries and he said keeping a Lithium battery at a low temperature and state of charge and it will be preserved for many years. The warmer it gets the faster they age. The more you cycle, the faster they age and so all adds up.
     
  6. Max*

    Max* Autopilot != Autonomous

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2015
    Messages:
    4,875
    Location:
    NoVa
    I thought that was expected too, at least from some article i read. 3-5% for the first 50k miles. Then 1-2% every 30k miles
     
  7. roblab

    roblab Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,030
    Location:
    Angwin (Napa Valley) CA
    Well, I have three years and more km than your chart shows. I have 7% loss. I charge at 30 amps, rarely supercharge, never to full. I think that it is mainly heat and time, not miles. This chart does not tell us what causes degradation. But it nicely shows degradation tapers off after a few years.

    Interestingly, Tesla has been keeping data from the first. They don't share much, but THEY say it's time, not mileage. You notice their drive train warranty states "Eight years, UNLIMITED miles".

    But what do they know, right?
     
  8. CHG-ON

    CHG-ON Still in love after all these miles

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2014
    Messages:
    2,766
    Location:
    Santa Cruz Mountains, USA
    I have lost 2.2% in one year and 14K mi. I have lost 5mi at the daily charge level. It seems like I have lost the range in just the last two months. It has been unusually warm in Coastal CA this year and I wonder if that has anything to do with it. I have really noticed it in the last two weeks, when we were in the 90-105 temp range. I charge to the daily mark almost every night at 40 AMPs. I have only charged to 100% twice and have used superchargers a handful of times. I wonder if I should charge to a lower level, per the previous comments. Even though it is only 5mi, I almost did not make it home one night, due to rude people not moving their cars from chargers when they were finished, with less than 1mi to spare, so it really can matter.
     
  9. Polly Wog

    Polly Wog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    220
    Location:
    Kihei, Hawaii
    I've lost 1 mile of rated range over the course of 18 months and 22,000 miles, and I live on Maui where it is always above 80 degrees. In fact, we've had a very warm year, with more 90 degree days than I can remember in my many years of living here. I NEVER charge to less than 90%, except on very rare occasions. I now charge at 240V/40 amps, but most of my first 6 months were 115V/12 amps.
     
  10. evp

    evp Nerd

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    Arvada, CO
    I've lost 4 rated miles in 11 months/37,000 miles. They seem to have disappeared suddenly after two separate firmware updates. I'm tempted to ascribe them to changes in the calibration of the rated miles calculation.
     
  11. Johan

    Johan Took a TSLA bear test. Came back negative.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,890
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    Degradation comes from both use (charge-discharge cycles) and from ageing. These effects are not additive. Rather, in most cases use should be the main driver of degradation. Time spent at very high or low state of charge, depth of discharge cycles, temperature and overall useage are the most important factors here. If a battery is in little use however, pure ageing will be the main driver of degradation.
     
  12. Max*

    Max* Autopilot != Autonomous

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2015
    Messages:
    4,875
    Location:
    NoVa
    Not my chart.

    I found the link, it's 6% for the first 50k miles, then 1% for every 30k miles, my memory was close: Tesla Model S Battery Life: How Much Range Loss For Electric Car Over Time?

    You posted your car for sale with 80k miles. 6% + 1% = 7%, so seems that you're in line with expectations.
     
  13. Irish Dan T

    Irish Dan T Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    31
    Location:
    Walla Walla, WA USA
    Me 2
     
  14. darthvdr

    darthvdr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    310
    Location:
    los gatos, ca
    I have 45k miles now on a 2 yr old P85+. Rarely supercharged and rarely go beyond 90% unless for several road trips. Charging rate of 28amps and staying around the 75% mark. Recently had a road trip to Southern California and at 100%, I am at 252 miles now.
     
  15. f-stop

    f-stop Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    580
    Location:
    Vancouver BC, Canada
    A slightly different question about degradation: let's say you drive just 10 or 20 miles a day and recharge each night. Is a long history of shallow discharge cycles like that bad for the battery's health? Or should you more deeply discharge cycle the battery periodically?

    I assume from the statement above that the answer is "no" ?
     
  16. Johan

    Johan Took a TSLA bear test. Came back negative.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,890
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    Shallow cycles are better. Also staying away from the highest and lowest states of charges (=voltages), especially the high voltages is better. In your example that would mean charging to say 50% and driving 20 miles down to 40-something % every day.

    The only benefit of an occasional full(ish) cycle is better balancing of the battery pack and a better calibration of the range estimation.

    No matter how little you cycle the battery and no matter how well you are able to stay away from high or very low voltages there's no away around pure ageing though.
     
  17. f-stop

    f-stop Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Messages:
    580
    Location:
    Vancouver BC, Canada
    thanks Johan - this is good info to know
     
  18. David99

    David99 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    Messages:
    2,055
    Location:
    Brea, Orange County
    I don't believe the theory time being the main factor over use. I have 60k miles yet cars with the same mileage that are much older than mine have the same degradation. So if time was the more important factor it would certainly show more impact.
     
  19. apacheguy

    apacheguy Sig 255, VIN 320

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,722
    Location:
    So Cal
    The curve is definitely steeper at first and eventually levels out. Could explain why at 60 K you show essentially the same numbers as someone at 80 K.
     
  20. Johan

    Johan Took a TSLA bear test. Came back negative.

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2012
    Messages:
    6,890
    Location:
    Drammen, Norway
    For the vast majority of use cases the time factor will be irrelevant. Any effect of ageing will simply be overpowered by degradation from use for almost all cars. If you were a car collector though, with the car just sitting in a garage plugged in and kept at 30% SOC or something the battery would still degrade though over time, that's all I'm saying.
     

Share This Page