Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Blue Origin - Booster Reuse - New Shepard

FlasherZ

Sig Model S + Sig Model X + Model 3 Resv
Jun 21, 2012
7,030
1,026
It seems that Blue Origin has successfully performed VTOL of reusable rockets, beating SpaceX to land a used rocket.

Jeff Bezos beats Elon Musks SpaceX in the reusable rocket race

One point of note is the much slower speed of the Blue Origin rocket - could the BO rocket deliver payloads at the lower speeds noted in the article? Or was that just a test and they'd have to go much faster?

To me, it would be logical that spacecraft would need the faster speeds to drive payloads and that the slower speed couldn't be used for anything other than a test?

(Asking as a completely clueless but interested observer...)
 

ggies07

Active Member
Nov 8, 2012
4,091
9,682
DFW

trils0n

2013 P85
Feb 12, 2013
1,529
1,982
Earth
One point of note is the much slower speed of the Blue Origin rocket - could the BO rocket deliver payloads at the lower speeds noted in the article? Or was that just a test and they'd have to go much faster?

To me, it would be logical that spacecraft would need the faster speeds to drive payloads and that the slower speed couldn't be used for anything other than a test?

(Asking as a completely clueless but interested observer...)

Blue Origin was testing for their mission, which is to get to space, not to orbit. (Few minutes of weightlessness for space tourism). Getting to orbit requires much higher speeds.
 
It seems that Blue Origin has successfully performed VTOL of reusable rockets, beating SpaceX to land a used rocket.

Jeff Bezos beats Elon Musks SpaceX in the reusable rocket race

One point of note is the much slower speed of the Blue Origin rocket - could the BO rocket deliver payloads at the lower speeds noted in the article? Or was that just a test and they'd have to go much faster?

To me, it would be logical that spacecraft would need the faster speeds to drive payloads and that the slower speed couldn't be used for anything other than a test?

(Asking as a completely clueless but interested observer...)

I'm sure it's because the B.O. rocket goes straight up 100 km, falls straight down and then fires the rockets to decelerate at the very end of the trip, all over an unpopulated area. That's quite different (and much easier) than what I understand SpaceX is attempting. SpaceX is going a long ways downrange, turning the rocket around, flying back in the direction of Florida, decelerating from 3x the speed of the B.O. rocket and then landing relatively near to a populated area.
 

Cosmacelf

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Mar 6, 2013
9,705
27,033
San Diego
Blue Origin never got to orbit. They went 100km straight up to edge of space and then straight back down. That's why they landed on solid ground. They never left that patch of desert. SpaceX gets payloads to orbit, so they have to travel down range quite a distance at a much higher speed (did you see the Blue Origin video, much wimpier rocket exhaust), then reverse course and come back to the origin point. Much harder to do.

Still kudos to blue origin, but nowhere nearly as hard as what SpaceX is doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EVCollies

Doug_G

Lead Moderator
Global Moderator
Apr 2, 2010
17,888
3,411
Ottawa, Canada
What's the cut-off?

Blue Origin is like Virgin Galactic - it's for tourist trips on a suborbital trajectory. You can't deliver anything anywhere; at best you get a few minutes of microgravity. It's an enormous difference to get to orbit - a couple of orders of magnitude more energy.

In fact Elon just tweeted that orbit requires 10X the speed, and 100X the energy.

Musk seems annoyed.

Can't blame him. I'm sure NASA was highly irritated at the gloating surrounding the first SpaceShipOne flight. Yeah, it's a tiny fraction of the cost of NASA missions, but it's also not anywhere near scalable to do orbital missions. A couple of orders of magnitude short of getting to orbit, and no way the hardware could ever be made to do that.
 

Doug_G

Lead Moderator
Global Moderator
Apr 2, 2010
17,888
3,411
Ottawa, Canada
They did fly the Grasshopper up several hundred meters and then land it... So they were first to fly a rocket upright like that, hover and then land. Then Bezoz to orbit. Hopefully next SpaceX to space and back.

No, Bezos didn't get anywhere near orbit. Needs 100X that energy to get to orbit.

Basically Bezos did a Grasshopper flight to higher altitude than SpaceX has done. Straight up, straight down, no real space flight.
 

Products we're discussing on TMC...

About Us

Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.

Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


SUPPORT TMC
Top