TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Blue Origin - New Shepard launch live 2020-10-13

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by doug, Oct 13, 2020.

  1. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,843
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    New Shepard NS-13 is scheduled to launch today at 9:35 a.m. EDT (1335 GMT) from Texas.

     
    • Informative x 1
    • Like x 1
    • Love x 1
  2. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    So did the retro rockets fire before the capsule landed? The telemetry showed 16mph and then 0 at landing so it looks like they didn’t even though the announcers said fully nominal.

    I didn’t listen to much chatter as it was way too much rah rah for me. I guessed that’s the difference between a serious company and a tourist operation.
     
    • Like x 1
  3. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,843
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    Definitely. That ring of dust around 47:32 is from the quick burst of the retros just before landing.
     
  4. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    If it is that quick, isn’t the deacceleration almost as quick as landing at 16 mph? You’d think if comfort was the issue, they’d fire for a couple of seconds. The main booster certainly hovers for way longer than it needs to.
     
  5. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,843
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    I think it's significant for comfort, and probably helps the margin on safety. Soyuz has done it for years. In this case it not just acceleration but also the jerk (time derivative of acceleration). Apparently they also have some shock absorbers in the seat mounts.
     
  6. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    So, any timeline for when Blue Origin starts their tourist operations?
     
  7. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
    So BO instead of competing with SpaceX and sending satellites and men to orbit, is now a glorified Disney ride attraction?
     
  8. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    That is really what it has been for over ten years. The fact they still haven't launched a person on New Shepard yet says a lot. New Glenn will someday do bigger and better things but it is still a ways off. I personally find the assumption that because BO is reasonably successful at New Shepard means they'll be able to jump to New Glenn and do similar things is a very strange assumption. There is very little similarities between the two rockets - especially the booster landing regimen. I wish BO the best but I think they'll have a lot of issues come up with NG that slows their already slow advancement.
     
  9. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    Yes. BO is going nowhere slowly. It’s almost as if Elon has this magic competitor field that turns all his competitors into idiots. Now that I think about it, he does. If you are a smart engineer, where do you want to work, SpaceX or BO? Tesla or GM?

    Teslarati is not impressed.

    SpaceX competitor Blue Origin completes first suborbital launch in 10 months

    And why does New Glenn look like a you know what? It definitely fails the Elon aesthetics test.
     
    • Like x 1
    • Funny x 1
  10. Nikxice

    Nikxice Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,054
    Location:
    Hudson, NH
    The only difference I noticed with this launch were new commentators (actually better). Since early 2015 it has been rinse and repeat approximately every six months. Postcards and seeds on the edge of Space. With the drive Jeff put into his amazing expansion of Amazon, I can't fathom he's happy with the progress of Blue.
     
    • Like x 1
  11. doug

    doug Administrator / Head Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,843
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    I don't know what they need to do to decide it's safe for passengers. This was their 13th launch, 7th with that booster. No mishaps as far as I know. It seems pretty safe. Definitely safer than Virgin Galactic which has a much more dramatic launch profile, is at least a decade behind schedule, and has already killed four people with four others seriously injured.

    I guess the idea is New Shepard space tourists are supposed to help fund New Glenn and other projects. But it's not like Bezos is hurting for cash these days.
     
    • Like x 2
  12. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    As Elon would say, Amazon had a different forcing function. Like many successful dotcoms that were the first in their industry, Amazon was literally overwhelmed with orders pretty much from day one. They had no choice but to grow quickly if they didn’t want to fail.

    What external force drives Blue Origin? With Bezos willing and able to dump billions into it, there are no real deadlines. SpaceX had to make money from the get go (or at least show a path to profitability) since it was always severely undercapitalized in comparison.
     
    • Like x 2
  13. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
    I am trying to understand what is 'orbital' about this (or any) suborbital launch? Where is the 'orbit' in going straight up above the atmosphere, to 100 KMs, and coming straight down?
     
    • Like x 2
  14. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
    Pretty cheesy, fake enthusiasm, no technical details. It was as cheesy as watching a QVC channel.

    Also why no cameras on board both the rocket and the capsule?
     
    • Like x 4
  15. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    BO did release an inside video of one of the their NG launches a while back. It was the most boring thing ever. I don't think it "sold" the trip very well, so they probably canned it as it wasn't generating any PR value.

    And I agree - very cheesy. I had to keep skipping, couldn't listen to them.
     
    • Like x 1
  16. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    It technically reaches space but doesn't reach orbit. So sub-orbital. The Karmann line is considered space.
     
    • Like x 1
  17. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
    #17 Electroman, Oct 15, 2020
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2020
    Sorry to be pedantic. The word 'orbit' in English dictionary has specific meaning. So sub-orbit should have some correlation to orbit.

    For example long range ballistic missiles are generally sub-orbital, and that makes sense, as it exits the atmosphere and then renters after traveling to another part of the world, without making a full orbit . You can say it did a partial orbit - now the usage of sub-orbital in that case makes sense.
     
  18. favo

    favo P3D+ owner

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,035
    Location:
    Durham, NC
    Note, suborbital is not hyphenated. Sense two is the relevant definition here.
    Also, here's a helpful article from Space.com: What's the difference between orbital and suborbital spaceflight?
     
    • Like x 2
  19. Xepa777

    Xepa777 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2017
    Messages:
    155
    Location:
    California
    Not that impressive.

    Orbital velocity in low earth orbit is around 7.6 kilometres per second, and a suborbital hop could stay below 1km/s and definitely wouldn't exceed 2. For example, if SpaceX did this test with the Starship they wouldn't even need heat shield tiles.

    NS is not in the same magnitude as anything SpaceX is currently doing, yet alone working on with Starship. To be fair, this mission was mainly used to test sensor+other tech for the Artemis mission.
     
  20. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
    I went suborbital yesterday when I jumped over my fence. It fits the definition to the tee.
     
    • Funny x 2

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC