New Shepard NS-13 is scheduled to launch today at 9:35 a.m. EDT (1335 GMT) from Texas.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Definitely. That ring of dust around 47:32 is from the quick burst of the retros just before landing.So did the retro rockets fire before the capsule landed?
Definitely. That ring of dust around 47:32 is from the quick burst of the retros just before landing.
I think it's significant for comfort, and probably helps the margin on safety. Soyuz has done it for years. In this case it not just acceleration but also the jerk (time derivative of acceleration). Apparently they also have some shock absorbers in the seat mounts.If it is that quick, isn’t the deacceleration almost as quick as landing at 16 mph?
So BO instead of competing with SpaceX and sending satellites and men to orbit, is now a glorified Disney ride attraction?
So BO instead of competing with SpaceX and sending satellites and men to orbit, is now a glorified Disney ride attraction?
The only difference I noticed with this launch were new commentators (actually better). Since early 2015 it has been rinse and repeat approximately every six months. Postcards and seeds on the edge of Space. With the drive Jeff put into his amazing expansion of Amazon, I can't fathom he's happy with the progress of Blue.
SpaceX competitor Blue Origin completes first suborbital launch in 10 months
Pretty cheesy, fake enthusiasm, no technical details. It was as cheesy as watching a QVC channel.The only difference I noticed with this launch were new commentators (actually better).
Pretty cheesy, fake enthusiasm, no technical details. It was as cheesy as watching a QVC channel.
Also why no cameras on board both the rocket and the capsule?
I am trying to understand what is 'orbital' about this (or any) suborbital launch? Where is the 'orbit' in going straight up above the atmosphere, to 100 KMs, and coming straight down?
Sorry to be pedantic. The word 'orbit' in English dictionary has specific meaning. So sub-orbit should have some correlation to orbit.It technically reaches space but doesn't reach orbit. So sub-orbital. The Karmann line is considered space.
Note, suborbital is not hyphenated. Sense two is the relevant definition here.Sorry to be pedantic. The word 'orbit' in English dictionary has specific meaning. So sub-orbit should have some correlation to orbit.
For example long range ballistic missiles are generally sub-orbital, and that makes sense, as it exits the atmosphere and then renters after traveling to another part of the world, without making a full orbit . You can say it did a partial orbit - now the usage of sub-orbital in that case makes sense.
Also, here's a helpful article from Space.com: What's the difference between orbital and suborbital spaceflight?sub·or·bit·al /ˌsəbˈôrbədl/
adjective
- situated below or behind the orbit of the eye.
- relating to or denoting a trajectory that does not complete a full orbit of the earth or other celestial body.
"near the peak of the sub-orbital trajectory the booster fell away"