tdelta1000
Active Member
By the looks of the video he enjoyed his brief time in the X and someone on his team impeded the opening of the door.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bingo.The falcon wing doors are no more complicated than the retractable hard tops of some convertibles. I think the Model X will turn out to be a great call by Tesla to build a vehicle that really has no competition. In time they will iron out any issues with the vehicle and by then there will be the Model X and everyone else.
Speaking as someone who's driven (briefly) the Model X -- it's no prototype. As for hitting his head, it's clear from the video that the door was only partially open; just compare with the door on the side of the camera.
The falcon wing doors are no more complicated than the retractable hard tops of some convertibles. I think the Model X will turn out to be a great call by Tesla to build a vehicle that really has no competition. In time they will iron out any issues with the vehicle and by then there will be the Model X and everyone else.
LOL. It's buildable all right, but it will generate a lot of costs for both in-factory QC and warrany (once delivered) - costs that Tesla certainly could do without until they become more profitable.
On the original topic - the established companies have such a huge investment (both $ and otherwise) it is natural for them to go into the stages of mourning (starting with shock and then denial) when something like Tesla comes along. Still, they have deep pockets, and some (probably not all) will work up a spirited response... Tesla needs to stay out ahead of them, because the bar always keeps getting set higher...
The falcon wing doors are no more complicated than the retractable hard tops of some convertibles. I think the Model X will turn out to be a great call by Tesla to build a vehicle that really has no competition. In time they will iron out any issues with the vehicle and by then there will be the Model X and everyone else.
Agreed. I think the Falcon Wings are in fact much less complex and costly to build than powered convertible tops like on the current Porsche 911-series convertible. Now that Tesla has figured out how to manufacture them I expect to see them in the Model 3 CUV.The falcon wing doors are no more complicated than the retractable hard tops of some convertibles. I think the Model X will turn out to be a great call by Tesla to build a vehicle that really has no competition. In time they will iron out any issues with the vehicle and by then there will be the Model X and everyone else.
Not disagreeing with you, but pointing out that a door conceivably gets opened and closed a lot more frequently than a convertible top. Yes? No? If yes, then we move into a territory of needing to stand up to significantly more cycles. That changes the discussion.
Agreed. I think the Falcon Wings are in fact much less complex and costly to build than powered convertible tops like on the current Porsche 911-series convertible. Now that Tesla has figured out how to manufacture them I expect to see them in the Model 3 CUV.
The fact that the base X70D is only $5K more expensive than a base S70D tells me that the Falcon Wings and the Panoramic windshield are not as costly as one would think.
I think the difference is that with a convertible you still have a side B and C pillar that don't move to which you can secure things like seatbelts and curtain airbags. In the X the middle curtain airbags are built into the seat and the seat itself supports the seatbelt. Those are the design challenges when building the safest SUV and choosing falcon doors.
Still, I LOVE the Falcon wing doors!
That said, for my primary use of the vehicle, I sure would have loved folding middle seats, or at least middle seats that could "spoon" the front seats as some speculated after seeing the initial models.
I'm not sure why people have such a hard time understanding this, but he never said that the Model X is some prototype concept car. He said THIS CAR IS A PROTOTYPE. You could sell a million cars of a Model and then show a prototype car of that Model then it's still nothing wrong with calling it what is is.His comment that the X is "only a prototype" is just a bit of trash talk, but is factually inaccurate.
I'm not sure why people have such a hard time understanding this, but he never said that the Model X is some prototype concept car. He said THIS CAR IS A PROTOTYPE. You could sell a million cars of a Model and then show a prototype car of that Model then it's still nothing wrong with calling it what is is.
I'm not sure why people have such a hard time understanding this, but he never said that the Model X is some prototype concept car. He said THIS CAR IS A PROTOTYPE. You could sell a million cars of a Model and then show a prototype car of that Model then it's still nothing wrong with calling it what is is.