AustinPowers
Total Smeghead
+1
It is a technology demonstrator on carbon fiber panels mass production.
You do realize that ManuVince was talking about the Fiat 500e, not the i3.
Or does the 500e also use carbon fiber in its bodywork?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
+1
It is a technology demonstrator on carbon fiber panels mass production.
Yeah but not selling them outside of CARB states really takes the 500e down a lot in my book. At least BMW is selling the thing to people. Not just trying to scare up CARB credits.
+1Yeah but not selling them outside of CARB states really takes the 500e down a lot in my book. At least BMW is selling the thing to people. Not just trying to scare up CARB credits.
+1They lose money on each unit sold because they lacked ambition. If FIAT decided to try to sell let say 10000 per year, with the exact same component, they would start making money on those models just with the economy of scale. but it is just a limited production compliance car, so it's expensive to produce...
Yes, and here's the post from MPT's better half's blog....
Different. First, the driving position in the i3 is way higher than the ActiveE. And while the i3 is lighter, they seemed to have delayed the full power to the wheels a bit so it doesn't seem as zippy off the line. Once moving it gets the EV grin going, but there's a second or two lag to full power which I find odd. It also aggressively backs off regen on non-perfect surfaces. I find myself using the friction brakes more often as the regen is often not doing what I anticipate it should do, especially around corners.How's the ride compared to the ActiveE?
$600/month lease for a two door car that has a range of 81 miles on a good day ?
i thought it was a 4 door....?
So when I drop my kid at school, I have to get down, walk over and open the passenger front door before my kid can open the rear door and get down ?
I can envision the folks behind me in the carpool lane either getting frustrated or having a good chuckle..
Yes that is correct. This article outlines the process a little ways down the page.
BMW i3 Design, Especially Its Doors, Requires A Learning Curve | PluginCars.com
They work like a '3rd door' on the Mazda RX8 and the Hyundai Veloster and some pickup trucks.
Hey, I had a compliance car and it was a real EV, with a Tesla drive train, to boot. (RAV4EV)+1
Doesn't comparing compliance cars to real EV's do disservice to potential EV buyers, and companies willing to get behind EV?
Hey, I had a compliance car and it was a real EV, with a Tesla drive train, to boot. (RAV4EV)
Yes that is correct. This article outlines the process a little ways down the page.
BMW i3 Design, Especially Its Doors, Requires A Learning Curve | PluginCars.com
They work like a '3rd door' on the Mazda RX8 and the Hyundai Veloster and some pickup trucks.
I don't understand why automakers like to saddle their products with these inconveniences. It really speaks to where BMW places the i3 in its lineup: a niche car for eccentrics. Well, I guess I shouldn't be surprised, given that the i3 looks to me like a descendant of the Honda Element.
Sure, you get to have a really cool ev because you live in CA. But there really IS life East of Sepulvida.
Rather than criticizing the manufacturers for providing CA compliance cars, how about questioning the other states who are not doing as much to promote EVs as CA is doing? Remember when there were CA cars and 49 state cars because CA was more aggressive in reducing emissions? Eventually the Feds adopted those more aggressive standards for the entire country. It is unlikely Tesla would exist as a company if the CARB regulations were not in place in CA.
Rather than criticizing the manufacturers for providing CA compliance cars, how about questioning the other states who are not doing as much to promote EVs as CA is doing? Remember when there were CA cars and 49 state cars because CA was more aggressive in reducing emissions? Eventually the Feds adopted those more aggressive standards for the entire country. It is unlikely Tesla would exist as a company if the CARB regulations were not in place in CA.
It is unlikely Tesla would exist as a company if the CARB regulations were not in place in CA.