You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also apple might loose half their value if they followed tesla model for their iPhones. You have to at least see the argument from both sides.Wow - what an unfortunate argument. Many premium automakers see sales of a model drop precipitously as the design interation ages. The car is then "redesigned" and sales pick up again due to the new features and apearance of the new model. Each redesign, however, costs billions of dollars in R&D, retooling, etc and take years to plan. By constantly upgrading and making the Model S "more perfect," Tesla IS focusing on the Model 3. They aren't Mercedes or BMW, so stopping the updates and letting the Model S become stale wold require a much sooner complete redesign, and the $$ for this design change would strip far more resources from the Model 3 that the incremental improvements they continue to make on the S and X. By upgrading their existing models and keeping them fresh, they can minimize the cost spent on refreshing these models and maximize resources for the Model 3.
Stop what? And give other automakers a chance to catch up?
It's all about the battery, silly goose!
Exactly!
Competitors are already working on 300+ mile cars (at least on the design boards) now. Faraday, VW, BMW, etc. But by continually keeping the pressure on now, Tesla can say "that's so 2016" (old news, we've been doing long before you competitors ever got started).
Further, the sooner they reach 350 to 400 miles of range, the whole argument of range anxiety gets completely squashed. Watch, in just a week or three from now, after the dust settles on the 2.6 seconds performance and 315 mile range of the the P100DL, Elon will showcase this same battery giving a 100D better than 340 mile EPA range. (Based on theory, using a similar 9% mileage boost that the 90D had over the P90DL).
Starts ups and innovators never let up on the go pedal. That's for legacy companies. Don't let them "grab defeat from the jaws of victory."
Exactly.
The implied premise of the article is that Elon Musk could simply assign more people to the Model 3 team to make it happen faster, but he's choosing not to. Apparently the author (a) thinks Elon Musk is stupid, (b) has never read The Mythical Man Month, and (c) doesn't realize that having the CEO "focus on" your project tends to amplify ambition more than productivity.
I had never heard of The Mythical Man Month until now.
A pointless article stating the obvious, that Tesla needs to focus on the Model 3, and taking the silly position that producing the P100D version is s significant distraction from making sure the Model 3 launches on time. I think Elon understands the importance of the Model 3 being a success.