Despite all the jokes, the Bolt at current pricing and discounts is a helluva good deal for someone looking for a solidly built 200+ mile BEV with an established track record. Someone ditching a gas guzzler for a Bolt (or any EV for that matter) should be applauded. Reading some of the posts on here, it seems there are some that would be happier if someone bought a gas car than a Bolt, which is really puzzling.
My expectation is the 2020 Bolt gets quite a few upgrades.
Let's leave the (self) applause for getting a long range BEV to those who had no other choice but to buy new, and those who will actually drive enough to overcome the higher pollution over an ICEV as it comes off the production line.
Driving a lot "for fun" or because "trains are smelly", self congratulations for driving a BEV really is telling more of one's ego than actual footprint. I'm here walking, cycling and taking trains all the time, breathing tire dust which increasingly is being caused by BEVs. I'll appreciate zero emissions from cars in urban conditions running on batteries (I am asthmatic) but to be frank, a Golf GTE does that for me also. And it only needs a tiny battery to do it. A first gen LEAF does it, Ioniq with a tiny mattery does it. Volt.
Now, the Bolt is no charging champion of course. With more and more new BEVs having proper charging speeds (the less than half battery size first gen Ioniq still keeps up with Bolt over 1000km), there is less and less need to "go big", pretty hard to defend such a purchase.
In an ICEV, the size of the tank doesn't matter much for the environment. It's all about mileage. With a BEV, a double sized battery (compared too 28kWh which seems to be very workable for actual owners who do also go beyond local errants) just adds one to three years before you even break even on your pollution compared to say a petrol Golf or Civic.
I bet VERY few BEV owners realize let alone acknowledge this.
I used to be such a fan of longer-is-better, but I recently had to accept the data, long range is a litteral waste that requires justification equally as much as a car on petrol when there are similar priced BEVs on sale. The decision to pay extra, lots extra, for the larger "tank" is a conscious one.
Rather than intentionally making cars seem cheaper by deducting average fuel cost from the shown price, Tesla might want to list environmental impact of their products and especially break-even mileage vs a sensible Polo 3-cylinder or Prius Prime.