TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker or making a Paypal contribution here: paypal.me/SupportTMC

Chicago to Boston and back in 48 Hours flat

Discussion in 'News' started by Luke, Jun 10, 2015.

  1. Luke

    Luke New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Chicago
  2. dgpcolorado

    dgpcolorado Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2015
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    The Western Slope, Colorado
    ^Not quite. They only made it to Greenwich CT, 180 miles from Boston. A trip like that should be a lot easier once the Supercharger infrastructure is filled out.

    It does raise the question: which is faster, driving at high speed and charging a bit longer or driving more slowly and cutting down the charge time? There must be an optimum speed for a given set of conditions, say: bottom half of the battery, the power available at the next Supercharger station, on relatively level terrain in mild weather. Someone here must have done the experiment.
     
  3. Objective1

    Objective1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2012
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Albany, NY, USA
    Isn't the general rule to not drive faster than the speed at which you can recharge (measured in distance of ranged gained per minute)?
     
  4. LetsGoFast

    LetsGoFast Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2014
    Messages:
    1,342
    Location:
    Virginia
    It varies with the distances involved. This post is probably my favorite because of the easy to grasp graphical rendition.
     
  5. dgpcolorado

    dgpcolorado Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2015
    Messages:
    703
    Location:
    The Western Slope, Colorado
    Interesting! I wouldn't have guessed that higher driving speeds would be so favorable on the typical 80-120 mile hops between Superchargers, given the increase in drag.

    The optimum trip time would also vary with smaller battery size, given the reduced amount that can be charged at higher kW rates. I'm curious how it will shake out with the Model 3 and what I presume will be a battery in the 55-60 kWh range.
     
  6. gimmi80

    gimmi80 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2015
    Messages:
    164
    Location:
    Pittsford, NY
    The article makes it sound like it was an heroic trip.
    Probably the journalist thought the tesla was a golf cart or something like that.
    We read in this forum about fellow model s owner taking long road trip all the time...
     

Share This Page