Glan gluaisne
Active Member
All the insurance companies seem concerned about is anything that either increases the probability of the car being involved in an accident (i.e. any go-faster, braking, steering or suspension system modifications) or increases the cost of any repair in the event of an accident.
Any film applied to the bodywork is likely to increase the cost to repair, as PPF isn't cheap and often large areas may need to be replaced following any bodywork repair. The snag is they don't have a graduated, logical, way of assessing the impact of any modification, they just have tick boxes from the various underwriters. The slightly odd thing is that Churchill and Direct Line are both underwritten by United Kingdom Insurance Ltd, so in theory should be much the same in terms of conditions.
Any film applied to the bodywork is likely to increase the cost to repair, as PPF isn't cheap and often large areas may need to be replaced following any bodywork repair. The snag is they don't have a graduated, logical, way of assessing the impact of any modification, they just have tick boxes from the various underwriters. The slightly odd thing is that Churchill and Direct Line are both underwritten by United Kingdom Insurance Ltd, so in theory should be much the same in terms of conditions.