qdeathstar
Completely Serious
Mmm.... which one is which though?One protects people, the other kills them. See the difference?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mmm.... which one is which though?One protects people, the other kills them. See the difference?
That’s probably why they are alarmists though. So they don’t have to move. Once the ice caps melt they won’t really have a choice but to move and it will be too late....I will be more willing to accept global warming alarmists when I see masses of people moving away from costal areas.
One protects illegal alien criminals just let out of jail, the other protects those who provide fuel for airplanes, ships, trucks and cars. See the difference?One protects people, the other kills them. See the difference?
Gavin Schmidt is the director of GISS. He is all in for the human-caused global warming theory. He had an encounter with Roy Spencer several years back. Check out what happened:Instead of referencing info from an ENTERTAINMENT website, how about use NASA's page?
Global Surface Temperature | NASA Global Climate Change
Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA.climate.nasa.gov
View attachment 661993
Home – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet
Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. Current news and data streams about global warming and climate change from NASA.climate.nasa.gov
Gavin Schmidt is the director of GISS. He is all in for the human-caused global warming theory. He had an encounter with Roy Spencer several years back. Check out what happened:
When you mention peer reviewed, you are actually saying "pal" reviewed.I guess that's as good an excuse as any to avoid getting peer reviewed. Publishing in a no-name journal is a good tactic too.
The next interglacial period will be our next shot at melting the ice caps. That is about 100,000 years from now.That’s probably why they are alarmists though. So they don’t have to move. Once the ice caps melt they won’t really have a choice but to move and it will be too late....
1. No-one is advocating extermination of anything.Advocating for the extermination of a species, based on a flimsy theory about a greenhouse gas, is a mental disorder of the highest magnitude.
So when it's too late. Great planning on your part, let's wait until the train hits us instead of getting off the tracks early. The funny thing about the climate deniers is they can't grasp the concept that if we do everything we can to avoid climate change and we were somehow "wrong" we still end up shifting society to cleaner and more sustainable energy production and use. There is no down side, except for those who can't handle change.I will be more willing to accept global warming alarmists when I see masses of people moving away from costal areas.
This is false.The latest data is showing that the earth is cooling off. The global mean temperature is the same as it was all the way back to 1980!
This is false.
You cannot cherry pick one section of the Earth and say - look it's cooling so everything is. This is the same thing physics deniers using Spencers UAH data tried during the so called "pause" years.
Edit also what @eevee-fan said.
@MitchP85D its ok not to care. Just say you don’t care. That would be better than trying to convince everyone a blue wall is red. It would make you seem a bit more sane aswell.
Truth is determined by OBSERVATION! When observations were not confirming previous predictions by the advocates of human-caused global warming theory, then the raw data was manipulated to fit the predictions of warming. The past was made colder and the present was made warmer. These are called "adjustments," which is just a fancy word for fudging.1. No-one is advocating extermination of anything.
2. Climate change is not a "flimsy" theory.
3. Professing a theory that you dont agree with is not a mental disorder. It's called freedom of opinion.
Basically, your are advocating the kind of totalitarianism that was rampant in the USSR. Truth is decided based on political idealogy, regardless of reality, and anyone who disagrees with you is branded using various pejorative labels up to and including mental disorder and/or meaningless labels ("non-person" in the USSR, "socialist" or "liberal" in your ideology). Given your apparent biases I find it ironic that your world view is almost exactly in line with the likes of Stalin.
For those of you who are lil' snowflake liberals, you may find this insensitive. Well, I'm just all broken up over that. But here it is. Obama is clearly not concerned about "climate change."So when it's too late. Great planning on your part, let's wait until the train hits us instead of getting off the tracks early. The funny thing about the climate deniers is they can't grasp the concept that if we do everything we can to avoid climate change and we were somehow "wrong" we still end up shifting society to cleaner and more sustainable energy production and use. There is no down side, except for those who can't handle change.
Wrong. UAH measures the earth's temperature globally! Check the breakdown of the regions:This is false.
You cannot cherry pick one section of the Earth and say - look it's cooling so everything is. This is the same thing physics deniers using Spencers UAH data tried during the so called "pause" years.
Edit also what @eevee-fan said.
Wrong. UAH measures the earth's temperature globally! Check the breakdown of the regions:
Roy Spencer, PhD. - Climate Change Research Scientist, Author, Former NASA Scientist
Climate Change Research Scientist, Author, Former NASA Scientistwww.drroyspencer.com
If you think Dr. Spencer is a physics denier, go to his blog page and tell him that. I am eager to see the responses you get. All you have to do is provide an email address and a moniker to blog on his site.