nwdiver
Well-Known Member
so you're a climate scientist.
we only know what we're told, and agendas inspire all of it.
You don't have to be a climate scientist to understand basic energy conservation laws and radiative forcing. That's what's so insane about this rejection of INCREDIBLY basic physics. John Tyndall and Svante Arrhenius weren't climate scientists... in their day no such thing existed but their discoveries are the foundation of modern climate science.
And no... you don't 'only know what you're told' that's the beauty of science. It's independently verifiable. CO2 is more transparent to incoming energy from the sun than outgoing energy from the Earth. Go get some CO2 and measure the wavelengths of light it's transparent or opaque to. It will be the same every time because physics. CO2 is 40% higher due to our pathetic addiction to fools fuel because math. CO2 being >40% higher means ~1,000TW of additional thermal energy 24/7/365 because physics. That's ~9M TWh/yr. For context all of humanity uses less than 200k TWh/yr. Or... the largest nuclear bomb ever released ~70TWh of energy. So every year the CO2 we've added adds the equivalent of 130,000 Tsar bombs or ~400M Little Boys worth of thermal energy. Amazing how ~1.5w/m^2 adds up over 510M km^2.
SCIENCE!
Last edited: