From the horse's mouth: SpaceX Demo-1 Launch Update – Commercial Crew Program
What! How did NASA have a person available to update the web page???
(seriously, aren't they furloughed? Could be an essential ISS ground person on a third screen)
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
From the horse's mouth: SpaceX Demo-1 Launch Update – Commercial Crew Program
SpaceX and Boeing are now 1 month apart.Test Flight Planning Dates:
SpaceX Demo-1 (uncrewed): March 2, 2019
Boeing Orbital Flight Test (uncrewed): NET April 2019
Boeing Pad Abort Test: NET May 2019
SpaceX In-Flight Abort Test: June 2019
SpaceX Demo-2 (crewed): July 2019
Boeing Crew Flight Test (crewed): NET August 2019
SpaceX also completed a pad abort test in 2015
Agreed. Am also like Everyday Astronaut and like to cheer for everyone to advance space technology. SpaceX is sexier and exciting for sure.Although while pulling for SpaceX to capture the flag, the future of the CCP is dependent on the safety and success of both companies, so have to be thorough.
reddit said:NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) released their annual report today, available from this page, or this direct link. Among other topics covered in the report, updates on the safety of the Commercial Crew Program (CCP) were included.
For all of us that yearn for the Apollo era and the amazing achievements and distances humanity covered there, remember that those were short bursts. We have lived in Space since October 2000, and that is a massively impressive achievement, bringing together a bunch of countries for one common goal. The Shuttle was crucial to making that a reality. And SpaceX and Boeing will ensure that keeps happening for the foreseeable future.Bob Cabana said:And, you know, I look back now, and anybody that is 18 years old or younger in the world has never known a time that there weren't humans in space. Since October 2000, we've had a permanent crew on the International Space Station
At the risk of going OT: NASA's Exploration Ground Systems on TwitterCrawler Driver (yes, THAT crawler)
Bridenstine carefully did not say anything about Boeing and CCP during the interview.
Still no launch date set for Boeing’s first CCP demo mission...
That would be an awesome mission for SpaceX: I wonder if a Crew Dragon could match the Hubble orbit and stay on station close enough to it so that EVAs would be possible? That sounds very difficult, but given how the first Crew Dragon recently docked perfectly (as far as we know) to ISS using the new automated system, maybe it would be possible to do a SpaceX mission to service Hubble. However, such a mission would likely cost NASA around $100 million, and I doubt there is money available in the budget for such an expenditure.This article has me wondering if NASA has or would ever consider using Crew Dragon or Starliner for more than just transferring astronauts/cargo to and from the ISS. I think the current contract with NASA is for 6 flights, imagine more are likely. An F9/Dragon 2 could probably reach Hubble, at which point everything gets more complicated than using a Space Shuttle. Designing and then flying an attachment mechanism would be difficult. There's also the lack of an airlock, so everyone would have to be suited up.
A Soft Capture and Rendezvous System (SCRS) was installed during STS-125. It's planned use is for the eventual de-orbit of Hubble.It's been 10 years since the last repair mission to the Hubble Space telescope. Hubble has had problems, the most recent is a 17 year old camera with a glitch. This article has me wondering if NASA has or would ever consider using Crew Dragon or Starliner for more than just transferring astronauts/cargo to and from the ISS. I think the current contract with NASA is for 6 flights, imagine more are likely. An F9/Dragon 2 could probably reach Hubble, at which point everything gets more complicated than using a Space Shuttle. Designing and then flying an attachment mechanism would be difficult. There's also the lack of an airlock, so everyone would have to be suited up. With the long delayed Webb Telescope eventually coming up, other than remote repairs I'm not sure NASA is even interested in saving Hubble again. Something to ponder.
The Hubble Space Telescope Has a New Camera Glitch
Did I just learn that a specific shuttle had Special Stuff in it just for taking care of the HST? If so, whatever all that entailed cannot - if I understand you - be incorporated into, for example, a Crew Dragon?....the shuttle that it was designed to be serviced with....