stopcrazypp
Well-Known Member
Maybe, but the 4000mah cells does have pretty good volumetric density though. Given Tesla was able to cram 85kWh under the Model S using 3100mah cells, it's probably pretty close.Didn't they cram 80 odd kWh into the floor of the A2? In which case they may have a volumetric advantage.
That doesn't have much to do with EVs though; in those use cases, the power density matters more and there are other cells that do significantly better in that regard.With very high cycle life they would have an advantage for stop-start, PHEVs or even diesel-electric hybrid trains.
I suppose fast charging/cycle life may be the big advantage when used in smaller packs (doesn't matter as much in the larger packs because you are limited by the charging infrastructure). But I haven't heard any estimates for specs besides from specific density (250-300Wh/kg) and cycle life (~5000 cycles).We are lookoing at multiple things
- price / kWh
- Energy & specific density
- Power density
- Recharge rate
- Number of cycles
From tesla's unwillingness to have QC for the 40 kWh S, it is clear the recharge rates aren't good with the chemistry Tesla is using. DBM claims good fast charge capbility.