You are now on ignore for the duration.
I don't agree with that approach.
Lots of us that are reading the thread don't have a solid medical background, and we're using this thread to help us understand risk factors.
The belief that that eyes were a reasonably high risk area of exposure wasn't limited to just the person you were arguing with. I wondered about the same thing myself. So the exchange, and especially the follow ups from others helped my own understanding of the risk factor.
By acting hostile to people you actually dissuade others from sharing their perspectives. There are so many people involved in this thread that if a single person does post something wrong it eventually gets thoroughly dissected. Where it likely helps a lot of people who aren't actively talking.
In this case that's exactly what happened.
Plus overall the exchange strengthened what you wanted in the first place. You wanted people to wear masks, and the result of that exchange the mask wearing side won.
I say this as someone who isn't opposed to masks (when wearing one would make sense), but as someone who doesn't think masks are viable at this stage because of the lack of availability. Like it would be great if New Yorkers would wear masks on public transportation, but I can't blame them for not because they aren't available.