I encountered something similar yesterday. The following card showed up in the mail. I was surprised by the thoroughness of the recommendations and the complete lack of political one-sidedness.
View attachment 525495 View attachment 525497
This is probably for the Market Politics thread, but it stating it is "Donald Trump's" recommendations is kind of politicizing it. Though the content was factual. I left it on the counter and my SO tossed it as soon as she saw the president's name on it.
Definitely a chance you did contract it. Sure you would like to know. I just saw a TV story of a local SF woman who lost her sense of smell before getting feverish etc. She wears perfume every day and she said she thought it was weird when she went to spray it on her wrists that she couldn’t detect it. She even held bottle up to her nose but nothing. She also noticed when her husband served her a plate of food saying that maybe he made it too spicy, that she said it was bland and he knew he had put in a lot into it. I tried looking for video but don’t see it. Either on KPIX5 or ABC7News.
Anyway thought I would relink to my earlier post to the UK letter the ear, nose and throat doctors wrote about this observation last week and how it might be an early marker for those already infected but asymptomatic otherwise:
Coronavirus
Hopefully my doctor can get the antibody test soon. The one she's trying to get is like a pregnancy test you put a couple of drops of blood into (instead of urine). She can probably mail them to us. This is an unusual symptom that differs from any other disease (at least anything more common) and is a good indicator whether you had it or not.
Speaking of Intel, I would not mind working in the chip lab right about now... think bunny suits, masks, dust free rooms.
I work for a company that makes support equipment for the IC industry. I'm a contractor, but about 2/3 of my pay comes directly from a contract they have with their biggest customer. I've been working at home for 10 years, so little has changed for me, but I have been nervous about losing my gig in a bad economic crash, but it appears the IC industry is holding together better than most.
The extreme clean room conditions needed for manufacturing probably helps. Those places are cleaner than an operating room.
You may be right. If you are, this chart lines up the numbers accordingly. Amber boxes show deaths that existed in that country before first one was actually reported in order to exponentially get to the numbers they have today.
This kind of indicates China, Korea and Canada reported accurate numbers, and the US, Italy and the World had far more existing deaths before they came to light.
View attachment 525658
Our local NPR has the BBC news a couple of times a day and back when this was mostly in China only someone who had been analyzing the numbers coming out of China said the numbers were too regular to be real. She suspected they were reporting numbers from an algorithm and not real numbers. We may never know exactly what did happen and what is happening now in China. It could be spreading again in China, but we won't know unless it breaks out into epidemic proportions again.
This is fairly useless, other than to the testing company.
If they wanted clinically useful data they would also perform RNA tests concurrently ... or just RNA test everybody and dispense with the antibody test.
Gathering data on the spread is a good thing in the name of understanding this better. But to be thorough, people should be getting both the antibody test and the active virus test. That will tell them how many people have it now and how many have recovered. They will probably find very tiny and possibly zero positives for the antibody, but an active virus test may find cases. At this point there will be very few people in rural areas who had it and got over it.