You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was going to post 'We need to live with it': White House readies new message for the nation on coronavirus, but I guess you beat me to the punch.
Let's see if this comes true...
Yep.ie we're the loser country who can't figure out how to manage a pandemic.
I remember seeing this story or pretty much the story on TV at the beginning of the below:San Antonio had 42/84 patients on vents in mid-April, 79/518 yesterday. Same general trend, but not nearly as dramatic.
There seems to be a real effort these days to keep people off ventilators as long as possible, since the vent survival rate is so low with COVID.
I think you are focusing on a trivial detail.Even if it’s headed in the right direction - which would be excellent news, I hope it is - What other region has had a significant first peak and then had to move backwards in reopening?
I'm not sure that is true. I understand civilian (non-HEPA level) masks as very effective in reducing droplets, but not aerosols. For the latter, ventilation is the key.Good job, you just made the argument FOR cloth masks, that would significantly reduce aerosolizing of the virus.
obligatory beard link
To Beard or not to Beard? That’s a good Question! | | Blogs | CDC
Facial Hair and Respirator Fit: A Review of the Literature - PubMed
All but two of the fourteen studies found that in the presence of facial hair, face seal leakage increases from 20 times to 1000 times.
Is it fair to say this applies only to respirators and tight-fitting masks (like N95), and not to surgical masks which leak anyway?All but two of the fourteen studies found that in the presence of facial hair, face seal leakage increases from 20 times to 1000 times.
Yep.
I wish I could find the editorial that I'd read in the past few months (it might've been in the The Altantic, NY Times or Politico). It essentially said that in the past, the world would look to the US for how to handle major situations like this, esp. given the top scientists, CDC, research universities and healthcare system (well, except for the price and accessibility problems). But, obviously, our handling is NOT the one to be followed this time.
It seems like the role models for COVID-19 handling now include Taiwan, South Korea (after they got their massive spike under control) and New Zealand, to name a few.
Interesting CNN clip on Canada’s Approach.
CNN - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
I refuse to be anyone's slave and wear a mask. Most masks (short of maybe the N95) have no effect on stopping transmission of this flu-like virus (and the manufacturer of the most common mask even has a disclaimer as to how ineffectual the mask is against it). Abortion up to and including birth is an abominable and inhumane practice, as is the marketing and selling of fetal body parts (Planned Parenthood's cash cow). Gay marriage wasn't enough obviously because now we've moved onto to countless genders, drag queen story hour for children, and transgender restrooms (no matter what stage of transition you claim to be in). I wonder if you're as critical against the rioters and scores of protesters or are giving them a pass because most of them are wearing (ineffectual) masks. It's amazing that protesting is allowed but churchgoing is not. The hypocrisy is endless.
It's also hilarious that someone is still advocating for zero cases before restarting life again. In what universe is that possible short of a full-on totalitarian state? The resistance to the idea of herd immunity is also an interesting social study, as are those who made passes for governors deliberately infecting nursing homes (the people who are most susceptible to any respiratory illness).
What is that a link to? It just the DNC opinion page about electioneering. Canada is a little quip buried in the page with no sources.
The jury was undecided on HCQ. Now a significant peer-reviewed study of thousand of patients is showing promise.
Does that hurt your narrative? That we are all going to die if we don't elect somebody who lets his coke-addled devil spawn dictate US foreign policy with China?
What is that a link to? It just the DNC opinion page about electioneering. Canada is a little quip buried in the page with no sources.
The jury was undecided on HCQ. Now a significant peer-reviewed study of thousand of patients is showing promise.
Does that hurt your narrative? That we are all going to die if we don't elect somebody who lets his coke-addled devil spawn dictate US foreign policy with China?
If you want to make a good troll post, you need to stick with one kind of crazy.
Nobody can be this crazy about so many things at the same time and still be functioning enough to make the post. See Anthropic Principle.
You have a binary choice. Fight the virus and limit its spread, or be a slave to the virus and set it free. All the rest is beside the point.I refuse to be anyone's slave and wear a mask. Most masks (short of maybe the N95) have no effect on stopping transmission of this flu-like virus (and the manufacturer of the most common mask even has a disclaimer as to how ineffectual the mask is against it). Abortion up to and including birth is an abominable and inhumane practice, as is the marketing and selling of fetal body parts (Planned Parenthood's cash cow). Gay marriage wasn't enough obviously because now we've moved onto to countless genders, drag queen story hour for children, and transgender restrooms (no matter what stage of transition you claim to be in). I wonder if you're as critical against the rioters and scores of protesters or are giving them a pass because most of them are wearing (ineffectual) masks. It's amazing that protesting is allowed but churchgoing is not. The hypocrisy is endless.
It's also hilarious that someone is still advocating for zero cases before restarting life again. In what universe is that possible short of a full-on totalitarian state? The resistance to the idea of herd immunity is also an interesting social study, as are those who made passes for governors deliberately infecting nursing homes (the people who are most susceptible to any respiratory illness).