Not surprising as most private schools tend to be religious and anti-science.
It depends quite a bit on the religion. I grew up in Southern California where most of the religious schools were Catholic. I went to one 1-5th grade that was poor, switched to a public school that was ranked tied for 1st in the Los Angeles area for 6-8, then back to a Catholic high school with a strong reputation for technology and science education. Probably 80% of my high school class went on to get a STEM education.
I knew a lot of other people who went to Catholic high schools and got STEM educations too.
There are some religions that are anti-science, but not all are. The Catholic church owns an Astronomical observatory in Arizona and there are Jesuit universities renown for the high quality of their scientific education.
Just FYI.
Perhaps the problem is thinking about immunity and infection as binary events. The immunologist below thinks the first phase of response to the virus is under appreciated. If someone test positive by PCR, has no symptoms, and is not contagious do they have covid?
Coronavirus: Why everyone was wrong
Interesting, but it doesn't square with observable fact. COVID is right now a raging forest fire in some of the warmest parts of the United States. This is definitely not following the pattern of a seasonal cold.
Right. My point was we both are taking N=1, or close to it, and drawing conclusions based upon our albeit limited experiences.
If I were to do that about public schools, I would conclude that all of them top out at about a 5th-grade equivalent education, they teach nearly no science, and are basically vocational schools. But I do understand that where I grew up the public schools were some of the worst in the country. I don't really believe they are all that way, but it sure did taint my impression early on. My children, on the other hand, are in great public schools, so that has helped balance out my impressions.
That's definitely not true most places I've lived. The public K-8 school a few blocks from where I grew up was rated tied for the best pre-high school education in Los Angeles county when I was going there. It was tied with the other public school on the other side of the hill from us. Our public school beat out private academies, much to their embarrassment. I went to a private high school, but the public high school we fed into had to have a special program for the kids from these two elementary schools. In 8th grade many of my classmates were talking about what they were going to do for grad-school.
Nope, if you REALLY want to know, I'm a Christian. As such, I will never vote for anyone that supports unlimited/unconditional abortion. It's my breaking point issue. As mentioned previously, I believe that the rights of the unborn child are woefully under-represented in our country.
I break ranks with Republicans on a lot of issues, which is why I have never registered with that party and consider myself more a conservative-leaning independent. Environment, science (anti-vaxxers), many issues I don't agree with the Republicans.
I'm sure, especially in this group, that won't go over well, but you basically asked, and that's the "why".
Only a few states don't have limits on abortion.
An Overview of Abortion Laws
A large number have a cut-off at viability, 20 weeks, or 24. Those with viability cutoffs usually define it at the point where a premature fetus has at least a 50% chance of survival. With the current state of medical science I think that's around 22 weeks.
There are quite a few Democratic politicians (including Joe Biden) who are of the opinion that they are personally opposed to abortion, but hold the opinion that it should be a personal choice. Some people who believe it should be allowed recognize that legally banning something that does have buy in from a significant percentage of the population is not going to work. That's why the war on drugs has been such a failure, not enough people believe they should be illegal.
With the abortion issue there is too much debate about when human life begins. Until somewhere close to 90% of the population can agree on a fairly narrow range, banning it will just create a black market with lots of health problems as a result. It's far better to keep as much as possible above ground and regulated instead of in a black market and unregulated.
Actually, yes, I do believe that the fetus is a child/person. The unique biological make-up of a fetus is unlike anything else that the human body goes through.
Honestly, you are correct that I would assume that abortion in the context of rape/incest is murder. I do view it as such. I also recognize the extremely unique circumstance that puts the woman in at that time and that she should and does have a degree of rights. It is an incredibly unique position, and despite my brashness here at times I am not all-knowing and I certainly am not not God, and for that reason I won't be able to give you a well-packaged, perfect answer for this situation. But it is where I personally draw the line, and one which even Christians would disagree with me on because most of them draw a hard line at conception (which is their right and I do understand the reasoning).
On the flip side, I do not believe that a woman should have absolute control to request an abortion right up until birth, because a fetus is very viable, and VERY interactive many months before birth takes place. If we draw the line a "viability" then that is a line which will constantly be moving throughout time as our technology improves. What happens when we invent an artificial womb and can transplant a fetus from a mother to that and care for it till full term? I don't know that answer, but I bet the science will eventually get there.
If you look at the chart in the link above, you will see that most states cut off abortion at some point, even most blue states. The number of people in favor of abortion on demand all the way until birth is very limited. There is a fairly strong consensus even among quite a few abortion advocates to cut off abortions somewhere around the time of viability of premature babies outside the womb. There are always some outliers who want to go to extremes, but most pro-choice advocates have attitudes well back from the extremes.
As for artificial wombs, science fiction author Lois McMaster Bujold set out to write some stories about the cultural impacts on a society in the future with this technology. The series became it's own entertaining yarn (she is an excellent writer who writes very entertaining stories), but uterine replicators play a part in a lot of stories.
I think it's pretty much flat, but about to head up. Looking at the deaths in aggregate like this can be a bit deceiving. Clearly there are upwards trends in some places, and downwards decay in mortality in others. But when dealing with exponentials, the upwards trend soon dominates. Pretty soon the overall will start rising.
In other news, looks like we have a PLAN for reopening schools. Hooray!!! The kids can go back to school!
https://twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1280548761417191431?s=20
View attachment 561738
I was talking to my brother last night. He and his ex-wife have been safely sheltering at their respective homes safely for the last 4 months, kids shuttling back and forth between the houses. They are both fortunate enough to be able to work remotely. There's no way it would make any sense to send their kids back to school in Washington State! What would the point of the last four months have been? Fortunately it seems that the schools are making a diversity of options available to parents. Obviously, the kids will be staying out of school until this is over. This is not complicated.
They should take a look at the Washington Virtual Academies
Welcome to WAVA!
