Daniel in SD
(supervised)
It means we're running tests on people who are no longer infectious but still have small amounts virus or fragments in their mucus. It's also possible (likely?) that many people are never very infectious at all. The virus doesn't go away on its own, if there is a low viral load long after being infected it is because the person did mount an immune response.From the article
Does that mean at low viral load the body would not mount an immune response? Or that it would be a weak response and not provide any immunity to future exposure?
I agree with Dr. Mina's conclusion that we need cheaper less sensitive tests and that we should use the cycle count data from PCR tests. I'm not sure I agree with calling PCR tests with high cycle counts "negative" and forgoing contact tracing. Someone with a low viral load now may have actually spread the virus to more people because the case was caught so much later! It seems like the cycle count should be recorded with the test results and further study is needed to determine how the number can assist with contact tracing.