WADan
Member
THANKS FOR SHARING YOUR EXPERIENCE. I think having a different perspective like this helps to make realistic assessment of our own product. Being aware of strength and weakness helps us owners to demand/choose better products. Being a blind fanboy (for example, refusing to see deficiencies and telling people to buy a different one) is not particularly helpful.I just had a rental car in Texas. I drove about 1000 miles. It was the latest GEN Toyota Camry. It had their latest suite of adaptive cruise, lane change, emergency braking, etc. In the 1000 miles that I drove, all kinds a very traffic conditions, in Dallas and Houston, I never had a single issue of phantom braking. No false warnings of anything.
It makes me realize how terrible those features work on my MYLR. I was cringing driving the Camry at first every time I went through a tree shaded area where my MY would have issues discerning things using vision only. I was anticipating having to give it throttle so I wouldn't be rear-ended like when my MY would hit the brakes because it was spooked by apparently a shadow.
I'd rather have something simpler that consistently works than supposedly a better system with a lot of issues. My experience, in my areas and use cases, shows that it is more of a beta product than something ready for production. If my wife had been driving the car, she wouldn't have reacted like I did when the MY braked hard and we would have been rear ended a few times for sure.
I love a lot of things about my car but this is an area where it is clearly deficient. Maybe it is because the vision only isn't up to snuff yet. i don't recall having all these issues on the demo cars I drove (on the same roads) that had radar enabled as well.
(BTW, I love my MYLR, and would buy it again).